You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Are talc based powders safe. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement would pay $440 million US state AGs. Are Talc Based Powders Safe .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put the amount of $400 million for resolving U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its larger $8.9 billion deal to settle claims that its Baby Powder and other talc products cause cancer. Are talc based powders safe.

J&J affiliate LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that describes how the company plans to pay different kinds of cancer sufferers in a bankruptcy settlement. Are talc based powders safe. J&J has stated that its Talc products are safe and do not cause cancer. The company is trying for another time to settle more than 38,000 cases in bankruptcy and stop new cases from coming forward in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan would pay $400 million into an additional trust to settle claims made with state attorneys general claiming that J&J had violated state unfair business practices as well as consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers about the safety of its talc products.

Several states had begun consumer protection cases against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing stopped those investigations from progressing in 2021. Are talc based powders safe. New Mexico and Mississippi had already initiated suit against Johnson & Johnson before then as well as the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands in LTL’s court papers.

New Mexico and Mississippi have taken steps to halt the bankruptcy of LTL in a joint move with cancer victims as well as their counterparts from the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They have claimed that a lucrative firm like J&J is not eligible for bankruptcy protections designed for those struggling with debt.
The first attempt by LTL to resolve the lawsuits in bankruptcy was dismissed after similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court ruled the LTL was not in “financial financial distress” and thus not eligible under bankruptcy law. Are talc based powders safe. LTL filed a second bankruptcy in just two hours following the dismissal, saying that its second attempt was different in that there was less money available and had a greater chance of securing an agreement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s latest bankruptcy violation of state law enforcement powers by trying to unilaterally cap the company’s liability for state consumer protection laws.

Are Talc Based Powders Safe

LTL’s recent filings also provided more details on the way in which the company will evaluate and pay claims for cancer when the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The most significant payments under the settlement will be $500,000 for people diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to age 45. Are talc based powders safe. The second payment would be $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer before age 45.

The proposed settlement applies discounts depending on the kind and severity of cancer, the individual’s age, the history of usage of talc and other variables. Are talc based powders safe. For instance the case of a woman who used daily talc products, had an ovarian cancer family history, cancer, and was diagnosed with Stage II cancer of the ovary at the age of 55 might qualify for a $21,125 payment under the settlement plan.

Judge gives order to J&J and talc oppositionists to discuss settlement negotiations.

Following another hearing in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy for talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company as well as those who oppose the plan to hold negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to manage the claims company made a settlement offer of $8.9 billion. Are talc based powders safe. While a group of law firms representing plaintiffs supports the proposal, another group opposes the deal.

This week, the opposition group, known as”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants, urged the bankruptcy court to dismiss the case by argument that LTL is not a factor in financial hardship.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a handful of law firms to stop claimants from deciding on the resolution plan–a plan the vast majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Are talc based powders safe. “The law firms who filed this filing have financial interests that do not align with, diverge from and contravene those that their customers. We will be submitting a response to the appellate court.”

Are talc based powders safe. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which has more than 80 mesothelioma victims who have filed lawsuits against J&J, said that J&J’s second bankruptcy effort will fail.

“J&J sends out press releases that boast about how amazing its plans are, but is requesting that details of the plan, such as what each sick person will be treated to,” Thompson said in the statement. “What do J&J have to keep secret?”

Kaplan has instructed both sides to create a arrangement plan under supervision from two mediators.

As of February 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free J&J from the thousands of lawsuits related to its talcum-based products.

But in the month of January, an appeals court of the federal government overturned the decision, ruling that the company was not able to be considered in “financial distress.”

When J&J’s attempt to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was turned down the same month, J&J declared bankruptcy about two hours after. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether or not to accept an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

In the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has bought 19 months during which cases have been held. Are talc based powders safe. The company wants claimants to accept their settlement. J&J would need 75% support for the settlement to be approved.

In addition to the gang of talc attorneys who have panned the bankruptcy of the company and the U.S. Trustee, a branch from the U.S. Department of Justice was also the one to file an appeal to dismiss the second bankruptcy case of LTL.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” These doors “are not available to anyone that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy purpose or that seek to abuse the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

On the other hand, J&J maintains there is no evidence conclusive that its products containing talc, such as its iconic baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has taken its products off of the market–first in North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

J&J intends to steer clear of the costly business of going to trial. It has prevailed in the majority of the cases that have been decided during trial, however, certain losses have been extremely punitive.
A well-known trial in Missouri produced a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug company but was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine cases involving talc, which are on appeal or have been settled. In 41 trials 32 have ended in a win by J&J or a mistrial, or verdict of a plaintiff dismissed upon appeal. Are talc based powders safe. Separately, the company has announced plans to settle over 1,000 cases worth $110 million. Bloomberg announced at that time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Are Talc Based Powders Safe

Our lawyers are handling the baby powder litigation in all 50 states. The talcum powder lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson have been in the process for several years. Are talc based powders safe. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products like baby Powder along with Shower to Shower, can cause ovarian cancer in certain women.

This page offers an J&J update on the talc power litigation and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling will impact the final settlement amount of these cases of ovarian cancer.

Have you reached the deadline by which you to start a lawsuit against talcum powder? Many who assume the time limit has expired to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or request a no-cost and quick case review online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Are Talc Based Powders Safe

June 2, 2023 Update: During the asbestos talc trial in California yesterday, a few technical glitches interrupted the opening statements of the defense attorneys. Are talc based powders safe. The jurors, attending from their homes via Zoom but did not hear Johnson and Johnson’s lawyer express doubts about the 70s research asserting the presence of asbestos in their product, but the opening was abruptly ended.

The plaintiff was able to present an initial witness Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the existence of other minerals in the talc’s mineral content is inevitable. He claimed that his group advised J&J in 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos the talc produced by the company, although with just 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Are talc based powders safe. A trial for the first time since J&J made the decision to split its talc section and declaring bankruptcy marks an important turning point for the ongoing litigation controversy. The trial began on Tuesday in the heartbreaking trial of a young plaintiff who was diagnosed with an extremely rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma last year, an illness that lawyers on both sides acknowledge is a harrowing tragedy.

The opening statements exposed the sharp differences in the two sides’ story. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim against Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceitful strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation procedure. According to the attorney, the company tried to manipulate the definition of asbestos, despite internal documents from 1978 and 1994 showing that asbestos fibers in the plaintiff’s tissue are included.

Johnson &J’s highly uncertain $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance with the course of this trial. Despite the distinctive nature of this mesothelioma lawsuit and its unique challenges compared to other talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could inflict a serious setback to J&J’s hope of gaining broad acceptance for their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc division vigorously defended its 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the opposition of talc injury claimants. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, it argued that the case was fundamentally different from the prior filing. The subsidiary emphasized the record-breaking commitment to $8.9 billion from J&J the biggest settlement ever to be made in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Are talc based powders safe. Not mentioned: how the magnitude of the settlement implies that it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed support from various plaintiffs’ law firms representing over the 60,000 plaintiffs. It is difficult to confirm but likely incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson &J Johnson’s bankruptcy filing, the very first trial on its cosmetic talc products that are believed to that contain asbestos is scheduled to start jury selection Monday, California at Alameda County Superior Court, the most favored location for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma was triggered by asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products and the company has denied. The trial also includes six retailers who are accused of selling talc-based products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are fighting over who should be chosen to fill the role of future claims representative. This is the role is crucially critical to resolving claim for talc. Are talc based powders safe. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs throughout the country was appointed as the claims representative during the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team would like Ellis to be appointed to that role yet again, but the lawyers for the plaintiffs in talc are arguing to the claim that Ellis has an interest conflict which would prohibit her from assuming that position again. The issue stems from the fact that Ellis was apparently involved in drafting the hotly litigated second bankruptcy, which raises concerns about her capacity to be neutral. However, the reality is that this bankruptcy will likely to be tossed out anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update: The fake company J&J created for the talc bankruptcy informed the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they had allocated $400 million to settle claims brought by states accusing J&J of misleading marketing for its talc product. Are talc based powders safe. It’s a $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It’s hard to imagine any scenario in which J&J can push these settlements for babies in these figures. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer may seem like a huge sum initially, it does not look great when you look at the numbers. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations would not provide victims with much more than an average settlement $100,000 per case. That’s not enough.

May 15th, 2023 Update: J&J may be in the middle of a suit from an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Are talc based powders safe. The group argues that J&J deliberately retracted the $61.5 billion fund-raising agreement together with its parent company, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and to validate the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group asserts this action could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of the rights of victims’ compensation. They are planning to study J&J’s actions as a result of the decision to dismiss LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10 2023 Update: The following week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments regarding a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy application of J&J company LTL Management. However, in the meantime it has approved an order that requires both parties to participate in a new settlement negotiation hoping that the global settlement can be come to fruition.

May 5 2023 Update: Talc manufacturer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging its talc products cause cancer due to asbestos exposure. Are talc based powders safe. Over 2,700 individuals have sued the company and it is paying $1 million per month to defend itself. The company’s recent $29million settlement that was handed down in South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing that assets should be distributed in an equitable manner among talc claimants instead of being seized in the hands of the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also filed for bankruptcy due to the litigation.

May 4, 2023 update: U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to resume talks with lawyers who turned down Johnson & Johnson’s $8.9 billion agreement. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared before a judge to discuss the next steps to take in this second case of bankruptcy and Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.

This is the best way to settle these claims with J&J. The baby powder settlement is likely to be completed. Are talc based powders safe. But it will require additional money – perhaps billions of dollars – coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are split on whether or not to accept the plan and not all clients see the situation the same way their attorney does. A second bankruptcy proceeding is destined to fail, and Judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to determine if she will dismiss the bankruptcy for the second time.

May 3 2023 Update: A group representing cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked to have they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is a bid to stop the litigation surrounding talc-based products. The group representing the claimants submitted a motion on Tuesday asking to the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back the lower court, with instructions to discharge the bankruptcy. Are talc based powders safe. The committee also requested that the halted tort litigation against J&J continue to proceed.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was denied in the Third Circuit earlier this year and offered a $8.9 billion agreement. The committee argues that the recent decision allowing LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, while also halting trials against J&J is a reason for the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J intends to file a response in the appeals court characterizing the filing as an “desperate and legally deficient attempt” by a handful of law firms who have competing financial interests.
May 1st 2023 Update: A most frequently asked question is how plaintiffs and their lawyers turn around $8.9 billion. Of course, that is an immense amount of money. However, there are lots of victims. Are talc based powders safe. These are actually a good arguments for plaintiffs. We were reminded recently with two talc trials led to huge verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon was settled with an award of $18.1 million. A month later, another mesothelioma-related talc case went to the court in South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million for the plaintiff. In both instances, the defendant was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the most prominent producers of talc in the U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: When J&J first tried to bring the talcum powder lawsuit into bankruptcy, they came with an offer to set aside $2 billion to settle the case. This was an absurdly low amount. None of the talc plaintiffs supported the offer. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 in the event that the talc victims are willing to accept bankruptcy settlements and they also have the support of a large part of the talc-related plaintiffs as well as their lawyers. Are talc based powders safe. However, 75% of plaintiffs of talc are required for bankruptcy plan approval, it a tough road due to the sheer number of lawyers with huge stocks of baby powder lawsuits opposed towards the agreement.

What could solve the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023, Update Talc patients have sought a court order to dismiss the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially strained. LTL has filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. Are talc based powders safe. In the end, however, the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January, saying LTL was not a candidate for bankruptcy relief because it failed to show financial difficulties.

The claimants contend that LTL’s third Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system and it’s being pursued in bad good faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant support” from companies representing approximately 60,000 people who are claiming. It is fair to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are not united over what they believe is an $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge ruled that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits claiming that the company sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. Although the trials for talc lawsuits are paused for at least 60 calendar days however, new lawsuits may be filed and lawyers can begin preparing their cases. Are talc based powders safe. The judge expressed his doubts about J&J’s attempt to relaunch its strategy in a second bankruptcy case.

April 13 2023 update: the most important update is about the $8.9 billion over the next 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer victims in MDL class action MDL collective action promised to fight the settlement with Talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s not enough for more than 70,000 cancer victims. Are talc based powders safe. The lawyers say that J&J could negotiate a greater settlement or settle individual claims in the event that the latest bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

But there’s a separate set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership in that class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated tens of thousands of cases. They want to settle now with what they believe is lower than what the victims should be paid. The argument they make is twofold. First, they argue that the settlement, which is about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

This is an argument that is difficult to make. However, their second argument has more substance: the victims will not afford to wait any longer and need their money today.

April 12 2023 Update: Many are seeking out how J&J can go through bankruptcy once more. The answer is complex and confusing. However, let’s attempt to explain the issue in a simple way.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to address both present and future lawsuits involving talc conclusively. Also, it thinks it can get a lower rate in the event of an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure to settle. Are talc based powders safe. Going back to hundreds of years of American time, the business claims that bankruptcy benefits all parties as it distributes settlement payments more equitably and more efficiently than trial courts where litigants are awarded significant settlements while others get nothing.

The gist in this 3rd Circuit decision was this isn’t a case that involves a profitable company making a subsidiary to take the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress thought of when drafting its Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled that the entity was financially trouble because J&J promises unlimited funding.
This is why J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the unlimited funding portion of the agreement but did not pledge that it would provide unlimited funds for lawsuits. The company claims that modified financing arrangements with its subsidiary addresses the concerns of the appellate court, while providing funds for claims. It’s as if giving victims less money will solve the problem at hand.

Attorneys representing cancer victims who oppose the agreement counter this with what you conclude is the legal argument. Are talc based powders safe. They counter with legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s decision. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed by the victims’ lawyers, who call it the most significant “fraudulent move in United States history.”

Despite all the legal jargon, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. It is however a method to push for this $8.9 billion settlement to keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 Update Bloomberg has an interesting article about a new law within New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the baby powder Class action suit. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange for a share of any winnings. J&J is now offering the payment of $8.9 billion to settle all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is publicly available because of an New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details regarding outside funding backers. The law is designed to respond to the increasing calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J has more than 60,000 claims when you combine state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party funding in mass tort claims is not without its pros and pros and. There is no doubt that we are seeing the ways that third-party funding can even the playing field for individuals and big corporations in the courtroom.

April 4, 2023 Update: It is fun to watch the worm turning in this litigation. J&J took another hit this week, when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place in the meantime that J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. Automatic stays have stopped thousands of talcum cases and prevented new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin talc-related liabilities off into a bankrupt company over a year back. Are talc based powders safe. When it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid only a few months back, the stay was revoked. J&J wanted to see it continue in the meantime of the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that of the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay having been officially lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the talcum powder class action MDL within a year. Seven new talc-related lawsuits were added to the MDL during the month of March, bringing the total number of cases pending to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update The following information is available: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation into the cost J&J Talc products have cost the government over the years.
A recent email addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) claimed that J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc-based products for many years, while tax dollars were spent treating those injured by exposure to the product. The suit comes just a few days after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Are talc based powders safe. J&J must begin making reasonable settlement offers to victims to getting this behind it. It’s a mark on one of the most prestigious businesses.

February 14 , 2023 Update: At an earlier hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.