You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Asbesto talco. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement will provide $400 million to US state AGs. Asbesto Talco .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a larger $8.9 billion effort to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder as well as other talc ingredients cause cancer. Asbesto talco.

J&J subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that details how the company intends to pay for different types of cancer patients in bankruptcy settlement. Asbesto talco. J&J has stated that its Talc products are safe and do not cause cancer. J&J is seeking another time to settle more than 38,000 cases in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from coming forward in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plans would deposit $400 million into an additional trust to settle claims filed with state attorneys general claiming that J&J had violated laws against unfair business practices in the State of New York and consumer protection laws, by deceiving consumers about the dangers of its talc products.

A number of states had already initiated consumer protection lawsuits against J&J prior to the first bankruptcy filing stopped these investigations from progressing in 2021. Asbesto talco. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed lawsuits with Johnson & Johnson before then, and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas, according to LTL’s court papers.

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy along with cancer sufferers as well as The U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who argue that a profit-making company such as J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections aimed at people with debt problems.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy cases was thrown out after similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court ruled the LTL was not in “financial difficulty” and thus not eligible of bankruptcy protection. Asbesto talco. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time in just two hours following the dismissal, saying that its second attempt was different due to the fact that there was less money available and more support for the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates state law enforcement authorities in attempting to unilaterally limit the liability of the company in state consumer protection measures.

Asbesto Talco

LTL’s new filings also included additional details about the way in which the company will evaluate and settle cancer claims should the bankruptcy plan be approved.

The largest amount of money under the settlement would be $500,000 for those diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before age 45, and $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with cancer of the ovary prior to age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement provides discounts based on the kind and severity of cancer, the patient’s years of age, their history of talc use and other factors. Asbesto talco. For example the case of a woman who used the talc product on a regular basis, had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer, and was diagnosed with Stage II cancer of the ovary at the age of 55 could be in line for a $21,125 payment under the plan.

Judge decides J&J and talc opponents engage in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company as well as those who oppose the strategy to engage in settlement talks, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to hold the claims–the company made a settlement offer of $8.9 billion. Asbesto talco. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs support the settlement, a different group opposes the move.

The previous week, the opposition group, which is known as the Official Committee of Talc Claimants, urged the bankruptcy court to dismiss this case by saying that LTL cannot be regarded as financially distressed.

“The filing is a desperate and legally ineffective attempt by a tiny number of law firms to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan, a plan the vast majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Asbesto talco. “The law firms who filed the filing are pursuing financial interests which are in conflict with, diverge from and oppose the interests they represent. We’ll be submitting an appeal an appeal to the appellate court.”

Asbesto talco. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which has more than 80 mesothelioma clients who have filed lawsuits against J&J, said that the company’s second bankruptcy try is likely to fail.

“J&J publishes press release describing how fantastic its plan is, while demanding that plan details–including what each sick person will receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in the statement. “What do J&J have to keep secret?”

Kaplan has instructed both sides to devise a second reorganization plan, under the supervision by two mediators.

As of February 2022 Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve the company from the tens of thousands of claims over its talcum products.

However, in the month of January, a federal appeals court ruled against the decision, ruling that the business could not be considered in “financial trouble.”

In the event that J&J’s request to make an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed in April, J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 calendar days to decide whether to allow the second bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit machine sputters after $6.9B cost of litigation involving talc.

In the two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has been able to buy 19 months in which cases have been in limbo. Asbesto talco. J&J wants the claimants to accept their settlement. J&J needs 75% of the vote for the deal to go through.

In addition to the group of talc lawyers who criticised the company’s bankruptcy play, the U.S. Trustee, a branch from the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting a motion to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a recent filing, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of bankruptcy courts are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” Those doors “are not open to parties that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy goal or who seek to use bankruptcy to delay or hinder their creditors.” Vara continued.

For its part, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their talc products, including its famous baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has taken the products from the market and will first launch them in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world next year.

J&J is determined to stay clear of the costly business of going to trial. It has prevailed in the majority of cases that have been decided at trial, but some losses have been punitive.
A well-known trial in Missouri led to an $4.7 billion judgment against the drug manufacturer that was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are appealing or decided. Out of 41 trials 32 have resulted in winning for J&J, a mistrial or plaintiff verdicts that were dismissed upon appeal. Asbesto talco. Additionally, the company has announced plans to settle nearly 1,000 cases worth the sum of $100 million. Bloomberg reported at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Asbesto Talco

Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits in all 50 states. The lawsuits involving talcum powder against Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for years. Asbesto talco. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including Baby Powder as well as Shower to Shower which can cause ovarian cancer among some women.

This page provides a J&J update on the talc power litigation and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will impact the final settlement amounts in these Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Did the deadline expire for you to make a claim for talcum powder? Many who believe that the statute of limitations has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us now at 800-553-2082 or get a free and quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Asbesto Talco

June 2 2023 Update: In an asbestos talc court trial held at the trial in California yesterday, a few technical glitches interrupted the opening statements made by defense attorneys. Asbesto talco. The jurors, attending from home on Zoom but did not hear Johnson and Johnson’s lawyer express doubt about the 70s research affirming the presence of asbestos in their product prior to the opening was abruptly ended.

The plaintiff was able to present its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals alongside the talc’s mineral content is inevitable. He also testified that his team was notified by J&J in 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos in the company’s talc, albeit in lesser than 0.1 percent. He also uncovered more asbestos in 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update: Asbesto talco. A trial for the first time since J&J decided to spin off its Talc division and declare bankruptcy is an important turning point for the ongoing lawsuit story. Trial began yesterday in the harrowing case of a young, 24-year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive type of mesothelioma last year. a diagnosis lawyers on both sides believe is a grave tragedy.

The opening statements exposed the sharp differences in the two sides’ narrative. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim on Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company employed deceitful techniques in its research practices and throughout the litigation process. The attorney claims that, according to, Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter asbestos’ definition, despite internal documents dating back to the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that fibers discovered in the tissue of the plaintiffs are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance as we course of this trial. Despite the distinct nature of the mesothelioma trial and its unique challenges compared to other lawsuits involving talcum powder A verdict in favor of the plaintiff could cause an unintended setback to Johnson & J’s hopes for broad acceptance of the settlement they have proposed among plaintiffs.

May 31 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc division vigorously defended the Second Chapter 11 filing in the facing challenges from injured talc claimants. In an objection submitted to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the company argued that the situation differed fundamentally from the first filing. The subsidiary emphasized the record-breaking commitment of $8.9 billion to J&J the largest ever settlement in a mass tort bankruptcy case. Asbesto talco. The issue is not discussed: whether this amount signifies that it’s an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed support from various plaintiffs’ law companies representing over the 60,000 plaintiffs. This is difficult to verify but is probably incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the very first trial concerning the cosmetic talc products it claims to that contain asbestos is scheduled to commence jury selection on Monday, California in Alameda County Superior Court, the most favored place for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products and that the company has denied. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are fighting over who should be chosen to fill the role of the claims representative in the future, which is vitally essential in resolving the talc claims. Asbesto talco. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs across the country was appointed the claims representative during the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be named to the position yet again, but the lawyers for the talc plaintiffs are objecting because Ellis has a conflict of interest which should stop her from holding that position in the future. This conflict is rooted in the reality that Ellis was believed to have been involved in the drafting of the highly contested second bankruptcy, which raises doubts regarding her capacity to remain neutral. The reality is this bankruptcy is likely to get dismissed anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update The pretend company J&J formed for the talc litigation bankruptcy told an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million as a settlement for claims made by states accusing the company of misleading advertising regarding its talc products. Asbesto talco. This amounts to an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer patients. It’s difficult to envision an eventuality where J&J could push these settlements for babies in these figures. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer sounds like a lot initially, it does not look good after you calculate the figures. This settlement proposal – by our rough calculations, would not provide victims with much more than a median settlement of $100,000 per instance. This isn’t enough.

May 15, 2023 Update: J&J may be in the middle of a suit from an advocacy group that represents cancer patients. Asbesto talco. The group claims that J&J intentionally canceled an $61.5 billion contract for funding with its subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision amounts to a fraudulent transfer of victims’ compensation rights. They plan to explore J&J’s actions following of the dismissal of the LTL’s bankruptcy case in its first instance.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week in it is expected that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion reject the second bankruptcy filing that was filed by J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. In the meantime, however LTL Management has filed an Order calling for both parties to participate in a new settlement mediation hoping that a global settlement deal can reached.

May 5th, 2023: Update on Talc supplier Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products cause cancer from asbestos exposure. Asbesto talco. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the firm, and it was paying $1 million per month to defend its legal position. The company’s latest $29 million settlement in South Carolina forced it to apply for bankruptcy protection and argue for equitable distribution of assets among talc claimants instead of being taken by the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of legal proceedings.

May 4, 2023 update: U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to restart talks on settlement with lawyers who turned down the company’s $8.9 billion agreement. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared in court to discuss next steps in this second case of bankruptcy. Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.

This is the answer to resolve the claims of J&J. A baby powder settlement can be made. Asbesto talco. But it will require more money – more billions of dollars – coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are split on whether to accept the proposal and not every client views this issue the same way their lawyer sees it. The second bankruptcy case is bound to fail with Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to decide if he will close the case for the third time.

May 3, 2023 Update The group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested an order from they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt litigation regarding talc-related products. The group of talc claimants submitted a motion on Tuesday asking for the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back an earlier court with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Asbesto talco. They also asked that the stopped tort litigation against J&J be allowed to proceed.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again following its bankruptcy filing that was rejected in the Third Circuit earlier this year which offered an $8.9 billion deal. The committee says that the recent ruling allowing LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, while also halting trials against J&J is a reason for urgent Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested it be requested that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J intends to file a statement to the appeals court declaring the filing an “desperate and legally deficient move” by a few of law firms with conflicts of financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: A question people keep asking is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers turn off $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s a lot of money. However, there are lots of victims. Asbesto talco. These are actually a good claims for plaintiffs. We were reminded recently by two talc-related trials that resulted in big verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma cases, a talcum powder trial in Oregon led to an award that was $18.1 million. A month later, another mesothelioma-related talc case went to hearing in South Carolina and resulted in the verdict of $29 million to the plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. One of the top suppliers of talc within the U.S.
April 30, 2023 Update: When J&J first tried to bring the talcum powder lawsuit into bankruptcy, it did so with an offer to reserve $2 billion to settle the case. The sum was ridiculously low. There was no one among the talc victims who agreed with the proposal. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs accept a bankruptcy settlement and they also have the support of a large portion of the talc plaintiffs and their attorneys. Asbesto talco. But 75% of the plaintiffs who are a talc, which is needed for approval of the bankruptcy plan is not an easy task since there are so many lawyers with massive inventories of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed towards the agreement.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 Update: Talc patients have sought a court order to dismiss their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially strained. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders cause cancer. Asbesto talco. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January The court ruled that LTL was not a candidate for bankruptcy relief since it was unable to demonstrate financial difficulties.

The claimants assert that the 2nd Chapter 11 case is an abuse of the bankruptcy system and that the case is being handled in bad faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement receives “significant support” from companies representing around 60,000 claimants. It’s fair to say that the plaintiffs’ attorneys and victims ‘ lawyers are divided on this $8.9 billion offer for settlement.

April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge has decided that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. Even though trials for the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for a minimum period of 60 days and new lawsuits are able to be filed, and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Asbesto talco. Judges expressed doubt about J&J’s attempt to relaunch its strategy in another bankruptcy case.

April 13th, 2023 Update: big announcement is an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer patients within the MDL collective action promised to fight the settlement along with the talc claimants. Why? They argue that it’s not enough money for 70 000 cancer patients. Asbesto talco. These lawyers argue that J&J should negotiate a bigger settlement or litigate individual claims in the event that the latest bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

But there’s a separate group of lawyers outside of the leadership group in group action. These lawyers have collectively amassed hundreds of thousands of cases. They want to settle today in what many believe to be far less than what these victims deserve. The argument they make is two-fold. The first is that they claim the settlement, which is about the equivalent of $100,000 per plaintiff is fair.

It’s a difficult argument to argue. But their second argument has more force: victims should now not wait and they want the money immediately.

April 12 2023 Update: Many are looking for ways J&J can go through bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and confusing. Let’s try to clarify it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to resolve both current and future talc lawsuits conclusively. That is, it thinks it will pay less in the event of a bankruptcy element that creates pressure to negotiate a settlement. Asbesto talco. Moving past 400 years of American history, the firm claims that bankruptcy benefits all parties by distributing settlements more equally and efficiently than trial courts, where litigants are awarded significant settlements while others get nothing.

The essence in this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a matter of one that makes a profit, but a subsidiary to take the legal risk and declare bankruptcy Congress thought of when drafting its Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated that the entity was financially crisis due to the fact that J&J promises unlimited funding.
Thus, J&J jumped on the funding unlimited part of the agreement and did not promise to fund unlimited lawsuits. J&J claims that its updated financing arrangements with its subsidiary addresses the concerns of the appeals court while offering funds to pay claims. As if providing victims with lower amounts of money would resolve the underlying issue.

Lawyers representing cancer patients who are against the agreement argue this argument by saying that it is countering legal nonsense with legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier decision. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed the lawyers representing victims call it the biggest “fraudulent transaction in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. But it’s a way to push for this $8.9 billion settlement, and to keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 update: Bloomberg offers an informative piece on a law that has been passed within New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the baby powder suit for class actions. Litigation funders Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged in exchange for a portion of wins. J&J is now willing the payment of $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is public information due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about outside funding backers. This rule is intended to respond to the increasing calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J faces over 60,000 claims when you include state and federal Baby Powder lawsuits. Third-party funding in mass tort claims has pros and cons. There is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party financing can help level the playing field for individuals and big companies in court.

April 4, 2023 Update: It is pleasing to see the worm turn in this legal battle. J&J was hit again this week, when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place while J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision at the U.S. Supreme Court. It has halted thousands of talcum powder cases and prevented new lawsuits from being filed ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc liabilities into a bankrupt subsidiary over one year in the past. Asbesto talco. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was insufficient a few months ago, the stay was removed. J&J wanted to see it continued pending an appeal to the SCOTUS appeal. The answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. There is a chance that of the Supreme Court is willing even to accept the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay being officially lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action involving talcum powder MDL within a year. Seven new talc cases were joined to the MDL during the month of March, bringing the total number of cases that are pending to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now calling for be the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation into how much J&J product containing talc has cost the government in the decades.
Recently, in an open letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) claimed that J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc products for long while tax dollars used to treat those who were injured through exposure to the chemicals. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Asbesto talco. J&J must begin making reasonable settlements to victims to in putting this behind it. This is a disgrace to one of the world’s greatest businesses.

February 14 , 2023 Update: At the hearing held today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.