Difference Between Talc And Cornstarch Baby Powder – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement will pay $400 million to US state AGs. Difference Between Talc And Cornstarch Baby Powder .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to address U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a wider $8.9 billion effort to settle claims that its Baby Powder as well as other talc items cause cancer. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder.

J&J subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that details how the company plans to pay different kinds of cancer victims as part of the bankruptcy settlement. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. J&J has said that its Talc products are safe and don’t cause cancer. J&J is seeking a second time to resolve more than 38,000 cases in bankruptcy and stop new cases from coming forward in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan would pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims brought in state courts by attorneys general alleging that J&J did not comply with state unfair business practices as well as consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers about the safety of its talc products.

Several states had begun consumer protection actions against J&J prior to LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from taking place in 2021. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought suit in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then as well as the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands, according to LTL’s court filings.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have decided to declare LTL’s bankruptcy unfinished as well as cancer patients as well as The U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who have argued that a successful business like J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections meant for the struggling debtors.
The first time LTL attempted to settle the lawsuits in bankruptcy was rejected after the same arguments. In the end, a U.S. appeals court determined the LTL had not been in “financial difficulty” and thus not eligible of bankruptcy protection. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time in just two hours following that dismissal, arguing that its second attempt was different due to the fact that it had less money and had a greater chance of securing the settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s new bankruptcy violates state law enforcement powers by seeking to unilaterally limit the liability of the company for state consumer protection laws.

 

Difference Between Talc And Cornstarch Baby Powder

LTL’s new filings also included more information about the way in which the company will evaluate and settle cancer claims should the bankruptcy plan be approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement would be $500,000 for patients diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to the age of 45, and $260,000 for people diagnosed with ovarian cancer that is terminal before age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement offers discounts based on the nature and severity of the cancer, the person’s years of age, their history of the use of talc, and other aspects. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. For example, a woman who used daily talc products, had an ovarian cancer family history, cancer, and was diagnosed with the stage 2 ovarian cancer by age 55 may be eligible for a $21,125 payment under the program.

Judge gives order to J&J and talc oppositionists to engage in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson &Johnson’s attempt to employ a Texas Two Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the plan to enter into settlement talks, Bloomberg reports.

In its second bankruptcy effort for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to manage the claims company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs support the settlement, a different group is opposed to the offer.

This week, the opposition group, called”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants, urged the bankruptcy court for dismissal of the matter by argument that LTL is not considered to be in financial hardship.

“The filing is an unjust and legally flawed attempt by a small number of law firms to try to prevent claimants from voting on the resolution plan–a plan that the vast majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. “The law firms involved in this filing have financial interests that conflict with, contradict and infringe on the rights that their customers. We’ll submit a response in the appeals court.”

Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which is home to more than mesothelioma patients who have filed lawsuits against J&J claimed that the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J will fail.

“J&J issues press releases about how great its plan is, while insisting that the plan’s details, including what individuals with illnesses would receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in the statement. “What is J&J’s plan to hide?”

 

 

Kaplan has commanded the parties to come up with another restructuring plan, with supervision of two mediators.

In February 2022, Kaplan confirmed J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve J&J from the tens of thousands of claims related to its talcum-based products.

However, in January of this year, a federal appeals court ruled against the verdict, ruling that the company could not be considered to be in “financial distress.”

In the event that J&J’s request to contest the U.S. Supreme Court was rejected on April 1, J&J filed for its second bankruptcy two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether to grant the second bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B talc litigation charge.

With the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has bought 19 months during which cases were placed suspended. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. J&J wants the claimants to accept their settlement. J&J requires 75% support for the deal to go through.

In addition to the team of talc lawyers who panned LTL’s bankruptcy plan as well, the U.S. Trustee which is a division of the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting motions to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.

In a filing this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of the bankruptcy court remain “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” These doors “are not open to parties who do not have a legitimate bankruptcy objective or seek to use bankruptcy to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

On the other hand, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its Talc-based products, such as the famous baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has taken the products of the market, first for North America in 2020–and the rest of the world later this year.

J&J is determined to stay clear of the expense of going to court. J&J has won the majority of cases that have been resolved through trial, though some losses have been punishing.
A well-known trial in Missouri led to an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug company and was later lowered to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine talc trials that are either in appeal or resolved. Out of 41 trials, 32 have resulted in winning for J&J, a mistrial or plaintiff verdict that was overturned in appeal. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. In addition, J&J in 2020 moved to settle around 1000 cases for $110 million. Bloomberg published at the time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Difference Between Talc And Cornstarch Baby Powder

Our lawyers are handling the baby powder litigation in every state. The talcum powder lawsuits for Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient found in products such as the Baby Powder as well as Shower to Shower, can cause cancer of the ovary in certain women.

This page offers the J&J talc power litigation update and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling impacts the ultimate settlement amount in the Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Have you reached the deadline by which you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many who believe that the statute of limitations has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Contact us now at 800-553-8082 or get a free and quick case review online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Difference Between Talc And Cornstarch Baby Powder

June 2 2023 Update: During the trial for asbestos-containing talc at the trial in California yesterday, technical issues interrupted the opening statements of the defense attorneys. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. Jurors who were watching from their homes via Zoom and hearing the Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer expressing doubt about the science of the 70s that claimed asbestos was present in their product prior to the session abruptly ended.

The plaintiff had the opportunity to introduce its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the occurrence of additional minerals along with the talc’s mineral content is inevitable. He claimed that his group was notified by J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos the talc of the company, but at just 0.1 percent. The asbestos was discovered by him in 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. First trial after J&J has decided to separate its talc division, and then declare bankrupt is a pivotal moment of the ongoing lawsuit controversy. The trial began on Tuesday in the tragic case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with an extremely rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma last year, which lawyers on both sides agree is a tragedy of a different kind.

Opening statements revealed the huge differences between the sides’ story. The attorney representing the plaintiff took aim at Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive methods in their research practices as well as throughout the litigation procedure. According to the attorney, Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter the definition of asbestos in spite of internal documents from 1998 and 1994 that show asbestos fibers found in tissue of the plaintiff are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement is hanging in the balance as we development of the trial. Despite the distinct nature of this mesothelioma-related case and its distinctive issues in comparison to other lawsuits involving talcum powder and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could be an enormous setback for J&J’s hope of gaining broad acceptance for their proposed settlement among plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc business is defending their second Chapter 11 filing in the facing challenges from injured talc claimants. In an opposition filed with the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the situation was fundamentally different from the earlier filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment to $8.9 billion in settlement from J&J the largest settlement ever in the history of a mass tort bankruptcy. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. Not mentioned: how the amount of the settlement signifies that it’s a fair settlement. J&J also claimed support from a variety of plaintiffs’ law firms representing more than 60,000 claimants. It is difficult to confirm however it is likely to be incorrect.

May 24, 2023 Update: Since Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the very first trial concerning the cosmetic talc products it claims to comprised of asbestos is set to start jury selection on Monday, May 24, California in Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good jurisdiction for plaintiffs. The plaintiff asserts that his mesothelioma was caused by asbestos exposure through J&J’s products, an allegation the company has denied. The trial also includes six retailers who are accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are currently in a dispute over who should be chosen to fill the position of the future claims representative, a role that is critically essential to the resolution of the claim for talc. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the country was appointed as the claims representative during the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be appointed to this position in the future, however lawyers representing the plaintiffs in talc are arguing on the grounds that Ellis has an unrelated conflict of interest that should prevent her from taking on that role again. The dispute stems from fact that Ellis was believed to have been involved in the creation of the hotly litigated second bankruptcy, raising doubts regarding her capacity to remain neutral. However, the reality is that the bankruptcy will be tossed out anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update The pretend company J&J made up to settle the talc litigation bankruptcy has informed a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have set aside $400 million to pay the claims made by states accusing the company of deceptive advertising for its talc products. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer victims. It’s hard to imagine the scenario in which J&J could push these settlements for babies at these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer may seem like a large sum initially, it does not look good when you do the math. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations would not provide victims with much more than an average settlement $100,000 per instance. That’s not enough.

May 15 2023 Update J&J might be facing lawsuit from an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. The group argues that J&J intentionally canceled the $61.5 billion financing agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group asserts this action could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of the victims’ compensation rights. They are planning to study J&J’s actions after the announcement of the dismissal of the LTL’s bankruptcy case in its first instance.

May 10, 2023 Update: Next week this week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy petition filed of J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. In the meantime, however, this bankruptcy court has issued an Order requiring both sides to participate in a settlement mediation to see if it will be possible to reach a global settlement agreement come to fruition.

May 5 2023 Update: Talc supplier Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging its talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. Over 2,700 people have sued the firm and the company was spending $1 million a month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29 million settlement in South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing for an equitable distribution of assets among talc claimants instead of being confiscated by the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also filed for bankruptcy due to lawsuits.

May 4, 2023 Update U.S. The bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to resume talks with lawyers who rebuffed Johnson & Johnson’s $8.9 billion settlement offer. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared in court to discuss next steps to take in this second case of bankruptcy and Judge Kaplan pushed more settlement talks.

This is the solution to settle these claims for J&J. The baby powder settlement is likely to be completed. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. But it will require additional money – perhaps billions of dollars from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers have a split opinion on whether to take the proposal or not and not all clients see the issue in the same manner their lawyer does. This second case of bankruptcy is destined to be a failure and Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to decide if he will close the case for the third time.

May 3 2023 Update A group of cancer patients suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested an order from the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to derail the litigation involving talc products. The group representing the claimants submitted a motion on Tuesday, asking to the Third Circuit to consider their appeal and return the case the lower court with instructions to discharge the bankruptcy. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. They also asked that halted tort litigation against J&J should be permitted to continue.
LTL requested Chapter 11 protection once again after its first bankruptcy filing was denied in the Third Circuit earlier this year with the possibility of an $8.9 billion agreement. The committee argues that the recent ruling, which allows LTL’s third Chapter 11 to continue, and also stopping trials against J&J, warrants an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested it be requested that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice-president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J intends to file a formal response to the appeals court calling the request a “desperate and legally flawed attempt” by a small number of law firms with conflicting financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: A most frequently asked question is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers turn down $8.9 billion. Of course, it’s quite a sum. However, there are lots of victims. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. They are a great claims for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently by two talc-related trials that ended in large verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma cases, a talcum powder trial in Oregon resulted in an award of $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma-related talc case went to the court in South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million for the plaintiff. In both instances, the defendant was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc., one of the top manufacturers of talc in U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: When J&J first attempted to drag the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, they came with an offer to set aside $2 billion for settlements. The amount was absurdly low. None of the talc plaintiffs agreed with the offer. This time around, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs agree to a bankruptcy settlement and also has the support of a substantial segment of the talc plaintiffs and their attorneys. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. But 75% of the plaintiffs who are a talc, which is required for bankruptcy plan approval is not an easy task since there are so many lawyers with massive collections of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed towards the agreement.

What could solve the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 Update: Talc cancer claimants have sought a court order to disqualify their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially distressed. LTL applied for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders caused cancer. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January in a ruling that said the company wasn’t eligible for bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial trouble.

The claimants contend that the 2nd Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system and that it’s being pursued in bad good faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from the firms that represent an estimated 60,000 people who are claiming. It is fair to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are not united over the $8.9 billion offer for settlement.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge ruled in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits claiming that the company sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. While trials in the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for at least 60 days, new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers are able to begin preparing their cases. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s ridiculous effort to revive its strategy with a second bankruptcy case.

April 13, 2023: Update on the big news is the $8.9 billion over 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer patients who are part of MDL class action MDL group action pledged to challenge the settlement those who claim talc. Why? They think it is not enough to pay for those suffering from cancer who are 70,000. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. They argue that J&J should seek a bigger settlement or settle individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

There is a different set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership group in that class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated many thousands of cases. This group wants to settle with what they believe is lower than what the victims should be paid. Their argument seems to be twofold. First, they argue the settlement – which amounts to an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

It’s a difficult argument to present. The second argument is more force: victims should now not wait and they want the money immediately.

April 12, 2023 Update: People are asking how J&J can file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complicated and convoluted. Let’s try to simplify it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to resolve both current and future lawsuits involving talc conclusively. It thinks it will pay less in the event of a bankruptcy element that creates pressure to negotiate a settlement. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. Going back to the 400-year span of American past, the company asserts that bankruptcy benefits all parties by distributing settlements more equally and more efficiently than trial courts in which some litigants receive substantial settlements while others get nothing.

The main thrust in the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – one that makes a profit, but a subsidiary to take the legal risk and declare bankruptcy – Congress contemplated when drafting the Bankruptcy Code. But it also said that the subsidiary was not in financial crisis because J&J promised unlimited funding.
This is why J&J took advantage of the unlimited funding portion of the deal and didn’t make any promises to offer unlimited funding for the litigation. The company claims that its revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary address the appeals court’s concerns while still providing funds for claims. It’s as if giving victims less money would solve the overall issue.

Attorneys representing cancer patients who are against the agreement argue this argument by saying that it is countering legal nonsense legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous ruling. The hyperbole wasn’t spared the lawyers representing victims call it the biggest “fraudulent transfer ever in United States history.”

Despite all the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. However, it’s a means of pushing this $8.9 billion settlement, and to keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 update: Bloomberg is running an intriguing article on a new law of New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the class action lawsuit. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged for a portion of any profits. J&J is now offering the payment of $8.9 billion to settle lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is publicly available due to an New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about funding sources outside of the. The rule aims to respond to the increasing calls for regulation of litigation funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you include state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party funding for mass tort lawsuits is not without its pros and pros and. There is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party financing can help level the playing field between people as well as large corporations in court.

April 4, 2023 Update: It’s fun to watch the worm turn in this lawsuit. J&J suffered another setback this week, when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to maintain the automatic stay during the time that J&J appeals an appeal at the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay frozen the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and stopped any new lawsuits from getting filed ever since J&J initiated the controversial effort to spin the talc liabilities into a bankrupt subsidiary over a year earlier. Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. When it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal some months ago, the stay was lifted. J&J wanted to see it continue in the meantime of the SCOTUS appeal. But the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The chance is that the Supreme Court is willing even to hear the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay fully lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action involving talcum powder MDL in over one year. Seven new talc lawsuits were brought into the MDL in the last month increasing the number of cases in the pending process up to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) launch an investigation into the cost J&J product containing talc has cost the government over the decades.
in a letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) in a recent letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten. J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc products over long while tax dollars utilized to treat people injured by exposure to the product. This lawsuit comes a few weeks after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. J&J must begin making fair settlement offers for victims in order getting this behind it. It’s a mark on one of the world’s greatest businesses.

February 14 2023 Update: In the hearing held today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Difference between talc and cornstarch baby powder. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

Difference Between Talc And Cornstarch Baby Powder >>

<< Difference Between Talc And Cornstarch Baby Powder

  • Online Divorce In Canada – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • How To Locate A Copy Of Divorce Papers Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Wht Happens When Filing For Divorce Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Cosmetic Talc Dangers – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Fl Divorce Papers Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Divorce Attorney Course Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Tesco Baby Powder Talc – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • When Did Talc Stop Containing Asbestos – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • How Do I Check My Divorce Status Online Nigeria – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Talc And Testicular Cancer – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • You May Also Like

    About the Author: Spider Mitch