You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Is modern talc dangerous. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement would provide $400 million to US state AGs. Is Modern Talc Dangerous .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its broad $8.9 billion deal to settle claims that its Baby Powder and other talc items cause cancer. Is modern talc dangerous.

J&J affiliate LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm plans to pay different kinds of cancer victims in an arrangement for bankruptcy. Is modern talc dangerous. J&J has declared that its Talc products are safe and will not cause cancer. It’s trying for a second time to resolve more than 38,000 lawsuits filed in bankruptcy, and to prevent any new cases from arising in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million to an additional trust to settle claims made by state attorneys general claiming that J&J violated laws against unfair business practices in the State of New York as well as consumer protection laws through misleading consumers regarding the safety of its talc products.

Many states had initiated consumer protection lawsuits against J&J prior to the first bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from moving forward in 2021. Is modern talc dangerous. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought actions for damages against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative subpoenas or demands in LTL’s court filings.

New Mexico and Mississippi have taken steps to halt the bankruptcy of LTL as well as cancer patients and those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who have argued that a successful firm like J&J does not qualify for bankruptcy protections designed for people with debt problems.
The first attempt by LTL to resolve the bankruptcy lawsuits was dismissed after similar arguments. The U.S. appeals court decided the LTL was not in “financial financial distress” and ineligible of bankruptcy protection. Is modern talc dangerous. LTL made a new bankruptcy application within two hours of that dismissal, arguing that the second bankruptcy was different as it had less money available and more backing for an agreement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s new bankruptcy violates state law enforcement powers in attempting to unilaterally limit LTL’s liability to state consumer protection laws.

Is Modern Talc Dangerous

LTL’s recent filings also provided additional details about how the company would evaluate and pay claims for cancer should the bankruptcy plan be approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement will be $500,000 for those diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to the age of 45, and $260,000 for people diagnosed with ovarian cancer that is terminal before age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement provides discounts based on the severity and type of the cancer, the person’s years of age, their history of the use of talc, and other aspects. Is modern talc dangerous. For instance someone who regularly used daily talc products, had a family history of ovarian cancer, and was diagnosed with Stage II cancer of the ovary when she was 55 may qualify to receive a payout of $21,125 under the program.

Judge decides J&J and talc opponents take part in settlement talks.

After another round of hearings in Johnson and Johnson’s efforts to employ a Texas Two Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company as well as those who oppose the plan to hold talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL Management–a subsidiary established by J&J to manage the claims company offered a settlement amounting to $8.9 billion. Is modern talc dangerous. While one firm representing plaintiffs support the proposal, another group is against the settlement.

This week, the opposition group, called the Official Committee of Talc Claimants in the bankruptcy court, demanded to disqualify the petition by saying that LTL is not considered to be financially distressed.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a tiny number of law firms to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan–a plan that the overwhelming majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Is modern talc dangerous. “The law firms involved in the filing are pursuing financial interests which conflict with, diverge from and are in opposition to the interests which their clientele. We will be submitting an answer an appeal to the appellate court.”

Is modern talc dangerous. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which boasts more than mesothelioma victims who have sued J&J for bankruptcy, told the company’s second bankruptcy try failed.

“J&J publishes press release that boast about how amazing its plans are, but is demanding that plan details–including what each sick person will receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in a statement. “What do J&J have to keep secret?”

Kaplan has instructed both sides to devise a second restructuring plan, with supervision by two mediators.

In February 2022, Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free the company from the thousands of lawsuits regarding its talcum products.

But in the month of January, a federal appeals court ruled against the verdict, ruling that the firm could not be considered to be in “financial financial distress.”

When J&J’s attempt to make an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court was denied on April 1, J&J filed for its second bankruptcy roughly two hours later. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 calendar days to decide whether or not to accept another bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit machine sputters after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

In the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has purchased 19 months of which cases have been suspended. Is modern talc dangerous. J&J wants the claimants to accept their settlement. J&J needs 75% acceptance in order for the agreement to be accepted.

In addition to the team of talc lawyers who criticised LTL’s bankruptcy plan, the U.S. Trustee which is a division from the U.S. Department of Justice, also filed a motion to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy case.

In a filing this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the the bankruptcy court are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” Those doors “are not accessible to those who do not have a legitimate bankruptcy objective or seek to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors.” Vara continued.

On the other hand, J&J maintains there is no evidence conclusive that its products containing talc, such as the famous baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has taken its products off from the market and will first launch them to be available in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world later this year.

J&J seeks to avoid the expense of going to trial. J&J has won most of the cases decided at trial, but some losses have been punitive.
A highly-publicized trial in Missouri resulted in a $4.7 billion judgment against the drug manufacturer but was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are appealing or decided. Of the 41 trials, 32 have resulted in winning for J&J, a mistrial or verdict for a plaintiff that was reversed in appeal. Is modern talc dangerous. The company also has announced plans to settle around 1,000 cases worth $110 million. Bloomberg announced at that time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Is Modern Talc Dangerous

Our lawyers handle the baby powder litigation in every state. The talcum powder lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for years. Is modern talc dangerous. The lawsuits assert that long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including Baby Powder and Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause ovarian cancer in some women.

This page gives an J&J Talc Power Update and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling impacts the ultimate settlement amount in the Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Did the deadline expire for you to start a lawsuit against talcum powder? Many people who think the statute of limitations has run out to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or request a free and quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Is Modern Talc Dangerous

June 2 2023 Update: At an asbestos talc court trial held at the trial in California yesterday, a couple of technical issues disrupted the opening statement by the defense attorneys. Is modern talc dangerous. Jurors who were watching from their homes via Zoom and hearing the Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his doubt about the science of the 70s that claimed asbestos was present in their product, but the opening was abruptly ended.

The plaintiff was able to present the first of their witnesses, Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of other minerals with talc is inevitable. He said that his team advised J&J in 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos in the talc of the company, but at just 0.1 percent. The asbestos was discovered by him in 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Is modern talc dangerous. First trial after J&J made the decision to split its talc division, and then declare bankrupt marks an important turning point within the ongoing lawsuit saga. The trial started yesterday in the heartbreaking case of a young, 24-year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma earlier this year. an illness that lawyers on both sides of the argument agree is a tragic loss.

Opening statements laid bare sharp differences in the two sides’ narrative. The attorney representing the plaintiff aimed his ire against Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company employed deceitful techniques in its research practices and throughout the litigation process. The attorney claims that, according to, the company tried to manipulate asbestos’ definition, despite internal documents from 1978 and 1994 showing that asbestos fibers in the tissues of the plaintiff are part of.

Johnson &J’s tangled $8.9 billion settlement offer hangs in the balance with the progression of this trial. Despite the distinctive nature of this mesothelioma case and its distinctive issues in comparison to most talcum powder lawsuits A verdict in favor of the plaintiff could cause a serious setback to J&J’s hopes for broad acceptance of the settlement they have proposed among plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit was able to defend their 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the in the face of challenges from victims of talc injuries. In a written objection to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the case was distinct from the earlier filing. The subsidiary emphasized the record-breaking commitment to $8.9 billion in settlement from J&J which is the largest settlement ever made in the history of a mass tort bankruptcy. Is modern talc dangerous. Not mentioned: how the amount of the settlement implies that it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from several plaintiffs’ legal firms that represent over 60,000 claimants. This is difficult to verify however it is likely to be incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: Following Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the very first trial involving the cosmetic talc products it claims to comprised of asbestos is set to begin jury selection on Monday in California in Alameda County Superior Court, which is a well-known court for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims that his mesothelioma was triggered by asbestos exposure through J&J’s products which J&J has denied. The trial also involves six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the second J&J Talc bankruptcy are disputing who should be chosen to fill the role of future claims representative. This is an important role essential to the resolution of the claim for talc. Is modern talc dangerous. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the country, was appointed as the claims representative in the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be named to the position and again, but attorneys for the talc plaintiffs are objecting on the grounds that Ellis has a conflict of interest that should prevent her from assuming that position once more. The issue stems from the possibility that Ellis was involved in drafting the controversially litigated second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her capability to remain neutral. However, the reality is that the bankruptcy will be dismissed regardless.

May 17, 2023 Update: The fake company J&J put together to settle the talc litigation bankruptcy disclosed to the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million to pay the allegations made by states who accuse the company of deceitful advertising for its talc products. Is modern talc dangerous. It’s a $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It’s difficult to envision an eventuality where J&J can push these baby powder settlements through with these numbers. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer may seem like a lot initially, it may not look very appealing when you consider the math. This settlement offer based on our rough calculations – would not pay victims much more than a median settlement of $100,000 per instance. It’s not enough.

May 15th 2023 update: J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit by an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Is modern talc dangerous. The group argues that J&J deliberately withdrew the $61.5 billion funding agreement with its subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group asserts this action is equivalent to a fraudulent transfer of the right to compensation for victims. They plan to explore J&J’s actions after the announcement of the dismissal of the LTL’s bankruptcy case in its first instance.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week this week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion dismiss the second bankruptcy application that was filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management. However, in the meantime, LTL Management has filed an Order calling for both parties to participate in a new settlement mediation with the hopes of achieving an international settlement agreement can be come to fruition.

May 5 2023 Update: Talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to many lawsuits claiming that its talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Is modern talc dangerous. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the firm and the company was paying $1 million per month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29million settlement in South Carolina forced it to apply for bankruptcy protection and argue for an equitable distribution of assets to talc claimants, rather than being seized from the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also filed for bankruptcy due to litigation.

May 4, 2023, Update U.S. bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to restart settlement discussions with lawyers who turned down the proposed $8.9 billion settlement offer. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties gathered in court to discuss the next steps in their second bankruptcy matter. Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.

This is the solution to settle these claims for J&J. The baby powder settlement is likely to be completed. Is modern talc dangerous. However, it’ll require additional money – perhaps billions of dollars coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided on whether to accept the proposal and not all clients see the situation the same way their attorney does. The second bankruptcy case is expected to go nowhere as Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to decide whether to discharge the bankruptcy for the 2nd time.

May 3 2023 Update A group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to derail the litigation involving talc products. The group representing claimants for talc filed a motion on Tuesday requesting that the Third Circuit to consider their appeal and return the case to a lower court, with instructions to discharge the bankruptcy. Is modern talc dangerous. They also requested that the lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J be allowed to continue.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its first bankruptcy filing was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year with a $8.9 billion payment. The committee believes that the recent ruling, which allows LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, and also stopping trials against J&J is a reason for an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested be the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J plans to file a response to the appeals court calling the request an “desperate and legally flawed attempt” by a few of law firms with different financial interests.
May 1st, 2023 Update: One most frequently asked question is how could the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their clients turn on $8.9 billion. Of course, that is an immense amount of money. But there are plenty of victims. Is modern talc dangerous. These are an excellent case for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently when two talc cases ended in large verdicts for plaintiffs. In February, a talcum powder mesothelioma trial in Oregon was settled with a verdict that was $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma trial involving talc was held for trial on the other side of South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million in favor of plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. One of the top producers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: In the year 2023, when J&J initially tried to take the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it was met with the option of putting aside $2 billion for settlements. The sum was ridiculously low. There was no one among the talc victims who agreed with the offer. This time around, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they also have the support of a substantial portion of the talc plaintiffs and their lawyers. Is modern talc dangerous. However, 75% of talc plaintiffs, which is needed for approval of the bankruptcy plan is a difficult road with so many lawyers with huge collections of baby powder lawsuits opposed against the proposed settlement.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 Update: Talc cancer claimants have asked a judge to disqualify the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, saying the company is not financially troubled. LTL applied for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders caused cancer. Is modern talc dangerous. In the end, however, the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that the company was not eligible for bankruptcy relief because it failed to show financial stress.

The claimants assert that LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system, and that it’s being pursued in bad faith. J&J asserts that the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant support” from companies representing approximately 60,000 people who are claiming. It’s fair to say that the plaintiffs’ attorneys and victims ‘ lawyers are not united over what they believe is an $8.9 billion settlement offer.

April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge decided that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the company offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. Although trials for the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for at least 60 calendar days however, new lawsuits may be filed, and lawyers are able to begin preparing their cases. Is modern talc dangerous. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s attempt to relaunch its strategy in another bankruptcy case.

April 13th, 2023 Update: The most important story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the next 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer victims within the MDL Class Action have pledged to challenge the settlement those who claim talc. Why? They argue that it’s not enough for those suffering from cancer who are 70,000. Is modern talc dangerous. The lawyers say that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or settle individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

However, there is a second lawyer group that isn’t part of the top leadership in the class action. These lawyers have collectively amassed hundreds of thousands of cases. They want to settle the case now in what many believe to be less than these victims deserve. Their argument appears to be two-fold. They argue that the settlement of around the equivalent of $100,000 per plaintiff is fair.

This argument isn’t easy to present. The second argument is more force: victims should no longer wait and want their money today.

April 12, 2023 Update: People are wondering if J&J is able to file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complex and complex. But let’s try to explain the issue in a simple way.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only option to resolve both current and future talc litigations in a definitive manner. Also, it believes that it will be less expensive should there be a bankruptcy element that creates pressure for a settlement. Is modern talc dangerous. Driving past the 400-year span of American history, the firm argues that bankruptcy benefits everyone by dispersing settlements more fairly and effectively than trial courts in which some litigants receive substantial settlements while others get nothing.

The essence of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – one that makes a profit, but an affiliate to accept the legal burden and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress considered when it was drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated the company was financially difficulty because J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
So J&J jumped on the funding unlimited part of the holding and didn’t promise to provide unlimited funding for lawsuits. The company claims that its new financing agreements with its subsidiary will address appeals court’s concerns while still providing funds for claims. It’s as if giving victims lower amounts of money would resolve the underlying issue.

Attorneys representing cancer victims who oppose the deal counter the agreement with what is countering legal nonsense legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s ruling. The hyperbole wasn’t spared attorneys representing the victims claim this the biggest “fraudulent transaction of assets in United States history.”

Despite all the legal jargon, J&J does not really think this bankruptcy will survive. But it’s a way of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement through and maintain pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 Update Bloomberg provides an insightful report on a brand new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the plaintiffs in the class action. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits in the case of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged in exchange for a portion of profits. J&J has now offered an offer of $8.9 billion to settle all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is made public because of an New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about funding sources outside of the. The law is designed to address the growing calls for the regulation of lawsuit funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you include federal and state Baby Powder lawsuits. Third-party funding of mass tort cases has pros and pros and. But there is no question that we are seeing how third-party financing can help level the playing field between people and large corporations in the courtroom.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s pleasing to see the worm turn in this case. J&J suffered another setback this week when they were denied by the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to continue the automatic stay during the time that J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay stopped thousands of talcum powder cases and stopped any new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc debts off into a bankrupt subsidiary over a year in the past. Is modern talc dangerous. When it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid only a few months back, the stay was revoked. J&J wanted to see it continue in the meantime of its SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that of the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay in effect, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action for talcum powder MDL within a year. Seven new talc cases were brought into the MDL in the last month which brings the total number of cases pending to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that authorities from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation into how much J&J talc products have cost the government in the many years.
Recently, in an open letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc product for years while tax dollars were spent on treating people who suffered injuries from exposure to the products. The demand comes just weeks after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Is modern talc dangerous. J&J needs to start making reasonable settlements to victims, in order the process of putting all this behind. It is a stain on one of the world’s greatest firms.

February 14 , 2023 Update: At a hearing today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.