Johnson And Johnson No More Tears Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would be worth $400 million to US state AGs. Johnson And Johnson No More Tears Lawsuit .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put the amount of $400 million for resolving U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a broad $8.9 billion deal to settle claims that its Baby Powder as well as other talc items cause cancer. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit.

J&J affiliate LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that describes how the company plans to pay different kinds of cancer victims in an arrangement for bankruptcy. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. J&J has stated that its products containing talc are safe and won’t cause cancer. J&J is seeking an additional time to conclude more than 38,000 cases in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from arising in the future.
The bankruptcy plan of LTL would pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims made from state attorney generals alleging that J&J violated the state’s unfair commercial practices as well as consumer protection laws by misleading consumers about the safety of its talc products.

Several states had begun consumer protection cases against J&J prior to the time that LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from progressing in 2021. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought suit for damages against Johnson & Johnson before then, and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative requests or subpoenas in LTL’s court papers.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy as well as cancer patients as well as the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who argue that a profit-making business like J&J can’t benefit from bankruptcy protections aimed at struggling debtors.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the lawsuits in bankruptcy was rejected after the same arguments. A U.S. appeals court decided that LTL wasn’t in “financial distress” and ineligible under bankruptcy law. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. LTL made a new bankruptcy application less than two hours after the dismissal, saying that the second bankruptcy was different as it had less money available and more backing for the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss LTL’s new bankruptcy violates the law enforcement powers of the state by attempting unilaterally to cap LTL’s liability to state consumer protection measures.

 

Johnson And Johnson No More Tears Lawsuit

LTL’s recent filings also provided more information about how the company would evaluate and pay claims for cancer in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The highest payments under the settlement would be $500,000 for patients diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before age 45, and $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with terminal ovarian cancer prior to age 45.

The proposed settlement offers discounts based on the type and severity of cancer, the individual’s years of age, their history of usage of talc and other variables. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. For example someone who regularly used the talc product on a regular basis, had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed an ovarian cancer stage II at the age of 55 may be eligible to receive a payout of $21,125 according to the plan.

Judge decides J&J and talc oppositionists to take part in settlement talks.

After another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to employ a Texas Two Step bankruptcy strategy for talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the plan to enter into talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL Management, a subsidiary created by J&J to manage the claims company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. While one firm representing plaintiffs support the deal, another group is against the settlement.

The previous week, the opposition group, dubbed the Official Committee of Talc Claimants, urged the bankruptcy court to dismiss the case by asserting that LTL cannot be regarded as financially distressed.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a tiny number of law firms to block claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan the vast majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. “The law firms who filed these filings have interests in finance that do not align with, diverge from, and infringe on the rights which their clientele. We will be submitting an answer to the appellate court.”

Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which includes more than mesothelioma victims who have filed lawsuits against J&J, said that the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J will fail.

“J&J issues press releases that boast about how amazing its plan is, while insisting that the details of its plan–including the treatment the individual sick individuals would receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in a statement. “What does the company have to keep secret?”

 

 

Kaplan has commanded the parties to devise a second strategy for reorganization, under supervision by two mediators.

In February 2022, Kaplan affirmed the ability of J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would release J&J from the tens of thousands of claims related to its talcum-based products.

In the month of January, an appeals court of the federal government overturned the decision, ruling that the company could not be considered in “financial distress.”

After J&J’s contest the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed in April, J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy just two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 calendar days to decide whether or not to accept an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

Through 2 Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has been able to buy 19 months in which cases have been on hold. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. The company would like claimants to vote on accepting their settlement. J&J requires 75% approval for the settlement to be approved.

In addition to the gang of talc lawyers who panned LTL’s bankruptcy plan as well, the U.S. Trustee, a branch belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice has also filed an appeal to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy courts are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” The doors “are not open to parties that do not have a legitimate goal or who seek to use the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

In its own words, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its talc products, including its popular baby powder cause cancer. J&J has been taking the products of the market first for North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.

J&J wants to avoid the costly business of going to trial. The company has won the majority of the cases that were decided during trial, however, certain losses have been extremely severe.
A highly publicized trial in Missouri produced a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker, which was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are in appeal or resolved. Of the 41 trials, 32 have ended in winning for J&J as well as mistrials or verdict of a plaintiff overturned in appeal. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. Separately, the company in 2020 sought to settle around 1,000 cases for $110 million. Bloomberg published at the time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Johnson And Johnson No More Tears Lawsuit

Our lawyers are handling baby powder lawsuits across all 50 states. The lawsuits involving talcum powder against Johnson & Johnson have been in the process for several years. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. The lawsuits assert that long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products like Baby Powder or Shower to Shower as well as other products, may cause cancer of the ovary in certain women.

This page offers a J&J Talc Power litigation update and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling impacts the ultimate settlement amount in these Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Have you reached the deadline by which you to make a claim for talcum powder? Many who believe that the time limit has expired to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us now at 800-553-2082 or get a no-cost, quick case review online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Johnson And Johnson No More Tears Lawsuit

June 2 2023 Update: In the asbestos talc case at the trial in California yesterday, a few technical issues halted the opening statement by the defense lawyers. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. The jurors, attending from home via Zoom and hearing the Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his doubts about the 70s research asserting the presence of asbestos in their product before the trial was abruptly closed.

The plaintiff could present their first witness, Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the existence of other minerals in talc is inevitable. He testified that his team informed J&J in 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos in the talc produced by the company, although at just 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. First trial after J&J has decided to separate its talc section and declaring bankruptcy marks a pivotal moment for the ongoing litigation story. Trial started on Monday in the heartbreaking case of a young 24-year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma earlier this year. an illness that lawyers on both sides of the argument agree is a tragedy of a different kind.

Opening statements revealed distinct differences between each side’s story. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. The attorney claims that, according to Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter the definition of asbestos, despite internal documents dating back to between 1978 and 1994 that showed asbestos fibers in the tissue of the plaintiffs are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance as we development of the trial. Despite the particularity of this mesothelioma-related case and the unique issues it faces compared to other talcum powder lawsuits ruling in favor of the plaintiff could inflict an unintended setback to Johnson & J’s hopes for broad acceptance of the settlement they have proposed among plaintiffs.

May 31 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc division vigorously defended their Second Chapter 11 filing in the opposition of talc injury claimants. In a written objection to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the company argued that the filing was fundamentally different from the earlier filing. It highlighted the extraordinary commitment of $8.9 billion to J&J as the biggest settlement ever to be made in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. Not mentioned: how the amount of the settlement means it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed support from several plaintiffs’ legal companies representing over 60,000 claimants. This is hard to verify but is probably incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: Following Johnson & Johnson’s 2021 bankruptcy filing, the very first trial involving the cosmetic talc products it claims to that contain asbestos is scheduled to start jury selection Monday in California with Alameda County Superior Court, the most favored place for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure in J&J’s product which the company denies. The trial also includes six retailers who are accused of selling talc-based products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are disputing who should be chosen to fill the position of future claims representative, the role is crucially critical to resolving Talc claims. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the country was appointed the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense attorneys want Ellis to be appointed to this position and again, but attorneys for the talc plaintiffs have raised objections on the grounds that Ellis has a conflict of interest which would prohibit her from taking on that role in the future. The conflict stems from the fact that Ellis was involved in the creation of the hotly disputable second bankruptcy, which raises doubts regarding her capacity to remain neutral. However, the reality is that this bankruptcy is likely to be tossed out anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company J&J put together to settle the talc litigation bankruptcy disclosed to an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they had allocated $400 million as a settlement for claims made by states accusing the company of deceptive advertising for its talc products. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It is hard to imagine a scenario where J&J could push the baby powder settlements given these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer sounds like a huge sum at first, it does not look very appealing when you consider the math. This settlement offer based on our rough calculations – would not pay victims much more than $100,000 per instance. This isn’t enough.

May 15 2023 update: J&J may be in the middle of a suit from an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. The group claims that J&J deliberately retracted a $61.5 billion funding agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and verify the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of right to compensation for victims. They plan to explore J&J’s actions as a result of the dismissal of LTL’s first bankruptcy case.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week next week, this week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments regarding a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy application from J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. However, in the meantime the bankruptcy has issued an order which requires both sides to participate in a second settlement mediation to see if an international settlement agreement can be brokered.

May 5th, 2023 Update: The talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products cause cancer from asbestos exposure. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. Over 2,700 individuals have sued the company and it is paying $1 million per month to defend itself. The company’s most recent $29 million verdict at the Supreme Court of South Carolina forced it to apply for bankruptcy protection and argue for equitable distribution of assets among talc claimants instead of being seized in the hands of the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have filed for bankruptcy due to legal proceedings.

May 4, 2023 update: U.S. bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch negotiations with lawyers who rebuffed the proposed $8.9 billion agreement. The court in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared in court to discuss the next steps to take in the second bankruptcy case. Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.

This is the answer to resolve the claims of J&J. A settlement for baby powder can get done. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. However, it will require more money – more billions of dollars by Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided on whether or not to agree with the proposal and not all clients view the issue in the same manner their attorney does. This second case of bankruptcy is expected to fail, and Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to decide whether to dismiss the bankruptcy for the second time.

May 3 2023 Update A group of cancer victims suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt the litigation surrounding talc-based products. The group of talc claimants submitted a motion on Tuesday requesting that the Third Circuit to consider their case and then send it back before a court of lower jurisdiction, with instructions to discharge the bankruptcy. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. The committee also requested that the stoppage of tort litigation against J&J continue to proceed.
LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was rejected in the Third Circuit earlier this year and offered the possibility of an $8.9 billion deal. The committee believes that the recent ruling, which allows LTL’s third Chapter 11 to continue, and also stopping trials against J&J should be subject to immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also asked that be the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J intends to file a response to the appeals court declaring the filing a “desperate and legally flawed effort” by a select group of law firms with competing financial interests.
May 1st 2023 Update: A most frequently asked question is how could the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their clients turn off $8.9 billion. That’s of course a lot of money. However, there are lots of victims. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. These are an excellent claims for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently in two talc trials which ended in large verdicts for plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon ended in an award of $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma trial involving talc was held for the court on the other side of South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million to the plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. One of the top suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30, 2023 Update: When J&J initially attempted to pull the talcum powder lawsuit into bankruptcy, it was met with an offer to set aside $2 billion for settlements. The sum was ridiculously low. All of the talc plaintiffs believed in it. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 for talc-related plaintiffs if they agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they have the support of a large portion of the talc plaintiffs and their attorneys. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. But with 75% of talc plaintiffs, which is necessary for bankruptcy plan approval is not an easy task since there are so many lawyers with huge inventory of baby powder lawsuits opposed in favor of the deal.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 update: Talc plaintiffs have requested a judge to dismiss their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly-made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially distressed. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders caused cancer. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. In the end, however, the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that the company was not eligible for bankruptcy relief because it did not show financial distress.

The claimants argue that the 2nd Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system, and that it’s being pursued in bad good faith. J&J says the bankruptcy settlement receives “significant support” from firms representing approximately 60,000 claimants. It’s safe to say that the plaintiffs’ attorneys and victims ‘ lawyers are divided on this $8.9 billion settlement offer.

April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge decided in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that it sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. Although the trials for Talc lawsuits are suspended for a minimum period of 60 days however, new lawsuits may be filed, and lawyers will begin preparing their cases. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. Judges expressed doubt about J&J’s ridiculous effort to revive its plan with a second bankruptcy case.

April 13th, 2023 Update: most important announcement is an $8.9 billion over 25 year period settlement offered. Lawyers representing cancer patients within MDL class action MDL group action promised to fight the settlement alongside talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s not enough for those suffering from cancer who are 70,000. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. These lawyers argue that J&J could negotiate a greater settlement or settle individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

However, there is a second group of lawyers that is not part of the leadership group in group action. These lawyers have collectively amassed many thousands of cases. They want to settle today for what many argue is lower than what the victims should be paid. Their argument seems to be two-fold. First, they argue that the settlement, which is about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

It’s a difficult argument to make. But their second argument has more force: the victims can now not wait and they want their money today.

April 12 2023 Update: Many are looking for ways J&J is able to file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and confusing. However, let’s attempt to explain it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to address both present and future talc litigations in a definitive manner. It believes that it will be less expensive if there is a bankruptcy component that applies pressure to negotiate a settlement. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. In a quest to cover hundreds of years of American past, the company believes that bankruptcy is beneficial to all parties as it distributes settlement payments more evenly and effectively than trial courts in which some litigants receive substantial award while others do not.

The essence of the 3rd Circuit decision was this isn’t a case that involves a profitable company making an affiliate to accept the legal risk and declare bankruptcy Congress contemplated when drafting the Bankruptcy Code. It also clarified that the subsidiary was not in financial crisis because J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
So J&J took advantage of the unlimited funding portion of the deal and didn’t promise to fund unlimited lawsuits. The company claims that its updated financing arrangements with its subsidiary address concerns of the appellate court, while offering claim payment funds. In the hope that offering victims less money will solve the underlying issue.

Attorneys representing cancer victims who oppose the agreement counter this with what you conclude is a defense against legal nonsense by pointing out legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets to LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous decision. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed the lawyers representing victims call it the biggest “fraudulent transfer that has occurred in United States history.”

Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. But it’s a way to push for this $8.9 billion settlement through and maintain the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 update: Bloomberg provides an insightful report on a brand new law that has been passed in New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the Class action suit. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits in the case of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange for a percentage of any settlements. J&J is now offering an offer of $8.9 billion to settle all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is made public because of a New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about funding sources outside of the. The law is designed to tackle the growing demands for the regulation of litigation funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you include federal and state child powder-related lawsuits. Third-party funding for mass tort lawsuits is not without its pros and cons. But there is no question that we are seeing how third-party funding could level the playing field for individuals as well as large corporations in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s interesting to watch the worm turning in this legal battle. J&J took another hit this week when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place while J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling before the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay halted thousands of talcum powder cases and prevented the filing of new lawsuits ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc debts into a bankrupt company over a year in the past. Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. After the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid a few months ago, the stay was removed. J&J was hoping to have it stayed in place until an appeal to the SCOTUS appeal. But the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. There is a chance that of the Supreme Court is willing even to take up the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay having been in effect, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the class action for talcum powder MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc cases were joined to the MDL during the month of March which brings the total number of cases in the pending process up to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now requesting that The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation into the amount J&J Talc products have cost the government in the many years.
In a recent letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) in a recent letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten. J&J of ignoring the risks of its talc product for many years, while tax dollars were spent treating those injured by exposure to the products. The suit comes just a few days after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. J&J has to begin making reasonable settlement proposals to victims to to put all of this behind it. This is a disgrace to one of the world’s greatest businesses.

February 14 2023 Update: At the hearing held today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Johnson and Johnson no more tears lawsuit. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

Johnson And Johnson No More Tears Lawsuit >>

<< Johnson And Johnson No More Tears Lawsuit

  • Ohio Online Divorce Forms – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Does Talc Naturally Contain Asbestos – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Johnson & Johnson Class Action Suit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Jnj Talcum Powder Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Totally Free Online Divorce – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Asbesto Talco – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • El Paso Tx Divorce Application Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Divorce Online With Children And Property – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Fort Bend County Divorce Lawyer Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • My Divorce Papers Online Review – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • You May Also Like

    About the Author: Spider Mitch