Johnson And Johnson Tylenol Lawsuit 1982 – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would make payments of the sum of $400 million US state AGs. Johnson And Johnson Tylenol Lawsuit 1982 .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its larger $8.9 billion settlement of allegations that its Baby Powder and other talc ingredients cause cancer. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982.

J&J affiliate LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm intends to pay different types of cancer victims as part of a bankruptcy settlement. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. J&J has claimed that its Talc products are safe, and don’t cause cancer. J&J is seeking the second time to end more than 38,000 lawsuits in bankruptcy and stop new cases from being filed in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million to a separate trust for claims made by state attorneys general alleging that J&J was in violation of state unfair business practices and consumer protection laws by misleading consumers regarding the quality of its talc products.

A number of states had already initiated consumer protection cases against J&J prior to the time that LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from progressing in 2021. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought suits for damages against Johnson & Johnson before then and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands, according to LTL’s court filings.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims and The U.S. Justice Department’s watchdog on bankruptcy, who have argued that a successful company like J&J is not eligible for bankruptcy protections aimed at struggling debtors.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy cases was dismissed following similar arguments. A U.S. appellate court determined that LTL was not in “financial difficulty” and therefore not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time just over two hours after the decision to dismiss, arguing that the second bankruptcy was different because there was less money available and had more support for the settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s renewed bankruptcy violates state law enforcement powers by attempting unilaterally to cap LTL’s liability to state consumer protection laws.

 

Johnson And Johnson Tylenol Lawsuit 1982

The filings of LTL’s latest bankruptcy proceedings also include more information on how the company would evaluate and pay claims for cancer when the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The most significant payments under the settlement will be $500,000 for people diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to age 45 and $260,000 for those diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer before age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement provides discounts based on the type and severity of cancer, an individual’s age, the history of the use of talc, and other aspects. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. For instance someone who regularly used the talc product on a regular basis, had the family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed an ovarian cancer stage II by age 55 may be eligible to receive a payout of $21,125 under the plan.

Judge gives order to J&J and talc opponents participate in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson &Johnson’s attempt to use a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company as well as those who oppose the plan to hold talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL Management–a subsidiary established by J&J to handle the claims company offered a settlement of $8.9 billion. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. While a firm representing plaintiffs support the offer, another group is against the settlement.

This week, the opposition group, dubbed the Official Committee of Talc Claimants and urging the bankruptcy court for dismissal of the matter by saying that LTL is not considered to be in financial hardship.

“The filing is a desperate and legally ineffective attempt by a few of law firms to try to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan, a plan the vast majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. “The law firms who filed this filing have financial interests that do not align with, diverge from, and contravene those which their clientele. We’ll submit an appeal before the court of appeals.”

Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM who has more than 80 mesothelioma clients who have sued J&J claimed that J&J’s second bankruptcy attempt will fail.

“J&J publishes press release about how wonderful its plans are, but is demanding that plan details–including what individuals with illnesses would receive,” Thompson said in the statement. “What do they have to conceal?”

 

 

Kaplan has instructed the sides to create a arrangement plan under supervision by two mediators.

The court in February of 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free the company from the hundreds of thousands of claims concerning its talcum products.

But in January of this year an appeals court in the United States overturned the verdict, ruling that the firm could not be considered in “financial financial distress.”

After J&J’s contest the U.S. Supreme Court was rejected at the end of April J&J filed for its second bankruptcy about two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether or not to accept the second bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

With the 2 Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has been able to buy 19 months in which cases have been on hold. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. The company wants claimants to decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J requires 75% acceptance for the settlement to be approved.

In addition to the group of talc lawyers who criticised the company’s bankruptcy play as well, the U.S. Trustee, a branch from the U.S. Department of Justice has also filed an application to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a recent filing, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of bankruptcy courts are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” The doors “are not accessible to those that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy objective or seek to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors.” Vara continued.

In its own words, J&J maintains there is no conclusive evidence that its talc products, including the famous baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has taken the products of the market, first on North America in 2020–and the rest of the world later this year.

J&J is determined to stay clear of the expense of going to court. J&J has won the majority of cases that were decided in court, however some losses have been harsh.
A high-profile trial in Missouri resulted in an $4.7 billion judgment against the drug manufacturer and was later lowered to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine talc trials that are either on appeal or have been settled. In 41 trials 32 ended with an outcome for J&J or a mistrial, or verdict for a plaintiff that was reversed after appeal. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. Additionally, the company has announced plans to settle more than 1,000 cases for 100 million dollars, Bloomberg announced at that time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Johnson And Johnson Tylenol Lawsuit 1982

Our lawyers are handling baby powder lawsuits across all 50 states. The lawsuits involving talcum powder for Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including the Baby Powder as well as Shower to Shower as well as other products, may cause ovarian cancer among some women.

This page gives an J&J Talc Power litigation update and provides an overview of how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amounts in these cases of ovarian cancer.

Did the deadline expire for you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many people who think the time limit has expired to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Contact us now at 800-553-8082 or get a no-cost, quick review of your case online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Johnson And Johnson Tylenol Lawsuit 1982

June 2 2023 Update: At the asbestos talc case that took place in California yesterday, a few technical glitches interrupted the opening statements made by defense lawyers. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. The jurors, attending from home via Zoom but did not hear Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express skepticism about the 70s science claiming asbestos was present in their product before the opening was abruptly ended.

The plaintiff could introduce an initial witness Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the existence of other minerals with the talc mineral is a given. He also testified that his team was notified by J&J in 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos in the talc produced by the company, although in less than 0.1 percent. He also found more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J made the decision to split its Talc division and declare bankruptcy marks an important point in the ongoing talc litigation controversy. Trial started on Monday in the tragic case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma in the past year, which both sides agree is a grave tragedy.

The opening statements exposed the distinct differences between each side’s story. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim against Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. According to the attorney, the company attempted to manipulate the definition of asbestos despite internal documents from the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that asbestos fibers in the tissue of the plaintiff are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance with the progression of this trial. Despite the distinct nature of this mesothelioma-related case and its distinctive issues in comparison to most talcum powder lawsuits and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could be an unintended setback to Johnson & J’s hopes for broad acceptance of their proposed settlement among plaintiffs.

May 31, 2023: Update from Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit was able to defend the Second Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from the talc injury plaintiffs. In an opposition filed with the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the company argued that the case differed fundamentally from the prior filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion by J&J as the biggest settlement ever to be made in a mass tort bankruptcy case. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. It was not mentioned how the amount of the settlement implies that it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from various plaintiffs’ law firms that represent over sixty thousand claimants. This is not easy to confirm however it is likely to be incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: Following Johnson &J Johnson’s bankruptcy filing, the first trial on its cosmetic talc items allegedly with asbestos content is scheduled to start jury selection Monday in California with Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good court for plaintiffs. The plaintiff asserts that his mesothelioma was triggered by asbestos exposure through J&J’s products which the company does not deny. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are now disputing who should be appointed to the post of future claims representative, the role is crucially essential to the resolution of the claim for talc. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs all over the nation, was appointed as the claims representative in the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense attorneys want Ellis to be appointed in that position and again, but attorneys for the talc plaintiffs are protesting due to the fact that Ellis has an interest conflict that would prevent her from being appointed to that post once more. The issue stems from the fact that Ellis was apparently involved in drafting the controversially litigated second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her ability to be neutral. In reality, this bankruptcy is likely to get dismissed anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update The fake company J&J created for the talc bankruptcy has informed a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have set aside $400 million to settle the claims brought by states accusing the company of misleading advertising for its talc products. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. It’s a $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It is hard to imagine the scenario in which J&J could push the baby powder settlements at these numbers. Although J&J’s $8.5 billion offer sounds like a lot initially, it does not appear appealing when you look at the numbers. The settlement plan based on our estimates – will not provide victims with much more than a median settlement of $100,000 per case. That is not enough.

May 15th 2023 update: J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit brought by an advocacy group that represents cancer victims. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. The group claims J&J deliberately retracted an $61.5 billion contract for funding in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to create the appearance of financial hardship and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims that this move is a fraud transfer of the rights of compensation for victims. They will investigate J&J’s actions after the announcement of the denial of LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10, 2023 Update: Next week this week, this week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a petition to dismiss the second bankruptcy application of J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. In the meantime, this bankruptcy court has issued an Order calling for both parties to take part in a second settlement mediation in the hope that an international settlement agreement can be been reached.

May 5th 2023: Update on Talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products cause cancer from asbestos exposure. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. Over 2,700 individuals have sued the firm and the company was spending $1 million a month to defend its legal position. The company’s most recent $29 million settlement on the state of South Carolina forced it to file for bankruptcy protection, arguing for an equitable distribution of assets to talc claimants, rather than being seized by the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of litigation.

May 4 2023, Update U.S. The bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to reopen talks on settlement with lawyers who rebuffed the company’s $8.9 billion settlement offer. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties gathered in court to discuss next steps to take in this second case of bankruptcy and Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.

This is the best way to settle these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement can be completed. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. But it will require more money, more billions of dollars – of Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers have a split opinion on whether to take the proposal or not and not every client sees this issue the same way their lawyer sees it. This second case of bankruptcy is destined to fail and Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to determine whether to close the case for the third time.

May 3, 2023 Update The group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested to have J&J’s Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is a bid to stop the litigation surrounding talc-based products. The group of talc claimants filed a motion on Tuesday requesting that the Third Circuit to consider their case and send it back an earlier court with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. They also asked that lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J be allowed to proceed.
LTL has filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its first bankruptcy filing was rejected by the Third Circuit earlier this year, offering the possibility of an $8.9 billion settlement. The committee argues that the recent ruling which allowed LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J and J&J, requires the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also requested that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J intends to file a response in the appeals court characterizing the filing as an “desperate and legally inadequate attempt” by a small number of law firms that have competing financial interests.
May 1st 2023 Update: One most frequently asked question is how plaintiffs and their attorneys turn off $8.9 billion. That’s of course a lot of money. But there are a lot of victims. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. They are a great claims for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently in two talc trials which ended in large verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February, a talcum powder mesothelioma trial in Oregon resulted in an award worth $18.1 million. The following month, a second talc mesothelioma case went to the court on the other side of South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million to the plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the leading suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: J&J initially attempted to pull the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it came with the option of putting aside $2 billion to settle the case. It was a ridiculously small amount. There was no one among the talc victims who supported it. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 for talc-related plaintiffs if they will allow a bankruptcy settlement and also has the support of a large segment of the talc plaintiffs and their lawyers. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. However, 75% of plaintiffs in the talc category, which is required for bankruptcy plan approval is not an easy task due to the sheer number of lawyers with vast inventory of baby powder-related lawsuits, opposed to the settlement.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 update: Talc Cancer victims have requested a judge to dismiss the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially distressed. LTL applied for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January, saying the company was not eligible for bankruptcy relief because it had not demonstrated financial difficulties.

The claimants argue that the 2nd Chapter 11 case is an fraud on the bankruptcy system and it’s being conducted in bad faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement receives “significant support” from companies representing an estimated 60,000 people who are claiming. It’s safe to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims are divided over what they believe is an $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge decided that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits claiming that the company sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. Although the trials for the talc lawsuits have been suspended for a minimum of 60 days and new lawsuits are able to be filed, and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. Judges expressed doubt about J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its strategy by filing the second bankruptcy case.

April 13 2023 Update: The big news is the $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer victims within the MDL group action pledged to fight the settlement alongside Talc claimants. Why? They believe it’s too little money for the more than 70,000 cancer victims. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. These lawyers believe that J&J should seek a bigger settlement or even litigate individuals’ claims if the current bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

But there’s a separate group of lawyers outside of the leadership in that class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated hundreds of thousands of cases. This group wants to settle in what many believe to be far less than what these victims deserve. Their argument appears to be two-fold. They argue that the settlement – which amounts to 100 million dollars on average per plaintiff – is fair.

This argument isn’t easy to present. But their second argument has more substance: the victims will no longer wait and want to get their money right now.

April 12 2023 Update: People are looking for ways J&J could file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complex and confusing. Let’s try to clarify the issue in a simple way.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only method to deal with both present and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. Also, it thinks it can get a lower rate if there is an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure to settle. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. Moving past more than 400 years in American history, the firm asserts that bankruptcy benefits all parties by distributing settlements more fairly and efficiently than trial courts, where some litigants receive significant awards while others receive nothing.

The basic tenet in this 3rd Circuit decision was this isn’t a case that involves a profitable company making an entity to assume the legal liability and declare bankruptcy Congress thought of when drafting its Bankruptcy Code. It also clarified that the entity was financially distress because J&J offered unlimited financing.
So J&J took advantage of the unlimited funding portion of the agreement and didn’t make any promises that it would provide unlimited funds for cases. The company says that its modified financing arrangements with its subsidiary will address concerns of the appellate court, while providing funds for claims. It’s as if giving victims less money will solve the overarching problem.

Lawyers representing cancer victims who are against the agreement argue this argument by saying that it is countering legal nonsense legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s decision. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed by the victims’ lawyers, who call it the most significant “fraudulent transfer of assets in United States history.”

Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. However, it’s a means to push for this $8.9 billion settlement to keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 Update Bloomberg is running an intriguing report on a brand new law that has been passed in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the baby powder class action lawsuit. Funders of litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange in exchange for a portion of wins. J&J has now offered an offer of $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is public information because of the New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about funding sources outside of the. The rules aim to address the growing calls for the regulation of lawsuit funders. J&J has to deal with more than 60,000 lawsuits when you take into account state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party funding of mass tort cases is not without its pros and cons. But there is no question that we are seeing how third-party funding could level the playing field between individuals as well as large corporations in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It is enjoyable to see the worm turn in this case. J&J was hit again this week when an appeals court in the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place as J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision before the U.S. Supreme Court. Automatic stays have frozen thousands of talcum powder cases and stopped any new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin the talc debts into a bankrupt company over one year ago. Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. When the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was invalid only a few months back, the stay was revoked. J&J had hoped to have it continued pending its SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. There is a chance that of the Supreme Court is willing even to hear the appeal? Low.
March 16th, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay officially lifted, the very first new cases were filed and incorporated into the Talcum Powder class action MDL within a year. Seven new talc lawsuits were added to the MDL in the past month, bringing the total number of cases pending to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now calling for the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) begin an investigation to determine how much J&J product containing talc has cost the government over the decades.
A recent email addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) claimed that J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc-based products for many years, while tax dollars were spent treating those injured by exposure to the chemicals. The demand comes just weeks following J&J’s dramatic loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. J&J needs to start making reasonable settlements to victims, in order in putting this behind it. It is a stain on one of the most prestigious businesses.

February 14 2023 Update: In the hearing held today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Johnson and Johnson tylenol lawsuit 1982. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

Johnson And Johnson Tylenol Lawsuit 1982 >>

<< Johnson And Johnson Tylenol Lawsuit 1982

  • Filing For Divorce Online Nevada – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • How To Find Out If A Divorce Has Been Filed In California And/Or Florida – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Online Divorce All Fifty States – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Online Divorce Questions Washington State – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Talc Powder Ovarian Cancer – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • File Utah Divorce Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Why Is Talc Bad – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Print Divorce Papers Online Free – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Can You Take The Divorce Parenting Seminar Online In Ga – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Children’s Book About Divorce Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • You May Also Like

    About the Author: Spider Mitch