Langan V. Johnson & Johnson Settlement – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would pay the sum of $400 million US state AGs. Langan V. Johnson & Johnson Settlement .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a broad $8.9 billion effort to settle claims that its Baby Powder and other talc-based product causes cancer. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement.

J&J subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday which outlines how the company will pay various types of cancer victims as part of a bankruptcy settlement. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. J&J has declared that its Talc products are safe, and will not cause cancer. It’s trying for another time to settle more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from coming forward in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plans would deposit $400 million into an additional trust to settle lawsuits filed by state attorneys general claiming that J&J was in violation of the state’s unfair commercial practices as well as consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers about the safety of its talc products.

A number of states had already initiated consumer protection actions against J&J prior to LTL’s bankruptcy filing stopped those investigations from progressing in 2021. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought actions for damages against Johnson & Johnson before then, and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands in LTL’s court filings.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have decided to declare LTL’s bankruptcy unfinished in a joint move with cancer victims and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. argue that a profit-making business like J&J is not eligible for bankruptcy protections intended for those struggling with debt.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the bankruptcy-related lawsuits was thrown out after similar arguments, when a U.S. appellate court determined it was not LTL had not been in “financial financial distress” and therefore not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time just over two hours after the dismissal, saying that its second attempt was different in that it had less money available and more backing for an agreement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates the law enforcement powers of the state by trying to unilaterally cap the liability of the company for state consumer protection measures.

 

Langan V. Johnson & Johnson Settlement

LTL’s filings for the new year also contained more information on how the company plans to evaluate and settle cancer claims in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement would be $500,000 for those diagnosed with mesothelioma that is terminal before age 45. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. The second payment would be $260,000 for patients diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer before age 45.

The proposed settlement provides discounts based on the kind and severity of cancer, the individual’s years of age, their history of using talc and other factors. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. For instance the case of a woman who used talc products weekly, had the family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed an ovarian cancer stage II at age 55 could be in line for a $21,125 payout according to the plan.

Judge gives order to J&J and talc opponents to discuss settlement negotiations.

After another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to utilize a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy for talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the plan to enter into talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

The second time it attempted to file for bankruptcy for LTL Management, a subsidiary created by J&J to settle claims – the company offered a settlement of $8.9 billion. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs agree with the proposal, another group opposes the deal.

In the last week, an opposition group, called the Official Committee of Talc Claimants and urging the bankruptcy court to dismiss this case arguing that LTL is not a factor in financial hardship.

“The filing is an unjust and legally flawed attempt by a few of law firms to try to block claimants from voting on the resolution plan, a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. “The law firms behind these filings have interests in finance that do not align with, differ from and are in opposition to the interests which their clientele. We’ll soon submit a response an appeal to the appellate court.”

Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM who is home to more than mesothelioma clients who have sued J&J for bankruptcy, told the company’s second bankruptcy try will fail.

“J&J issue press releases about how wonderful its plan is, while insisting that the plan’s details, including what each sick person will receive,” Thompson said in the statement. “What does the company have to hide?”

 

 

Kaplan has directed the parties to devise a second strategy for reorganization, under the oversight of two mediators.

On February 20, 2022 Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve J&J from the tens of thousands of claims over its talcum products.

In January of this year an appeals court in the United States overturned the verdict, ruling that the firm could not be considered in “financial trouble.”

After J&J’s contest the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed on April 1, J&J filed for its second bankruptcy two hours after. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days in order to determine whether to allow another bankruptcy.

J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B talc litigation charge.

Through two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has purchased 19 months of which the cases were in limbo. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. The company is requesting that claimants accept their settlement. J&J will require 75% of the vote for the deal to pass.

In addition to the group of talc lawyers who criticised LTL’s bankruptcy plan as well, the U.S. Trustee, an arm of the U.S. Department of Justice, also filed an appeal to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a recent filing, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of bankruptcy are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” Those doors “are not open to parties that lack a legitimate bankruptcy reason or want to abuse the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

For its part, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its Talc products, which includes the famous baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has been taking the products from the market and will first launch them in North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

J&J is determined to stay clear of the expense of going to trial. It has won the majority of cases that have been resolved in court, however some losses have been very punitive.
A high-profile trial in Missouri led to an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker but was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine talc trials that are either appealing or decided. Out of 41 trials 32 have resulted in an outcome for J&J as well as mistrials or verdict of a plaintiff dismissed upon appeal. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. Additionally, the company has announced plans to settle more than 1000 cases for $100 million, Bloomberg stated at the time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Langan V. Johnson & Johnson Settlement

Our lawyers are handling baby powder cases in all 50 states. The talcum powder lawsuits for Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for years. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including the Baby Powder and Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause ovarian cancer among some women.

This article provides an J&J Talc Power Update and provides an overview of how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling impacts the ultimate settlement amounts in these Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Have you reached the deadline by which you to start a lawsuit against talcum powder? Many who believe the statute of limitations has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us now at 800-553-2082 or get a free and quick case review online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Langan V. Johnson & Johnson Settlement

June 2, 2023 Update: During an asbestos talc court trial held which took place in California yesterday, a couple of technical issues disrupted the opening speech of defense lawyers. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. Jurors watching from home on Zoom, did hear Johnson and Johnson’s lawyer express doubts about the 70s research asserting the presence of asbestos in their product prior to the proceedings abruptly ended.

In the meantime, the plaintiff was able to introduce the first of their witnesses, Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals alongside the talc mineral is a given. He claimed that his group was notified by J&J in 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos in the talc manufactured by the company, though in lower than 0.1 percent. He also found more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J took the decision to disband its talc segment and file for bankruptcy is an important point for the ongoing litigation controversy. The trial started yesterday in the harrowing case of a young, 24-year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive type of mesothelioma last year, a diagnosis lawyers on both sides acknowledge is a tragedy of a different kind.

Opening statements revealed stark differences in each side’s narrative. The attorney representing the plaintiff took aim on Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of misleading methods in their research practices as well as throughout the litigation procedure. In the words of attorney the company tried to manipulate the definition of asbestos, in spite of internal documents from between 1978 and 1994 that showed fibers discovered in the tissue of the plaintiffs are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement offer hangs in the balance as we course of this trial. Despite the distinctive nature of the mesothelioma trial and the unique issues it faces compared to other talcum powder lawsuits A verdict in favor of the plaintiff could cause the company with a major setback in its hopes of broad acceptance of the settlement they have proposed among plaintiffs.

May 31st 2023: Update from Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc business is defending their 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from talc injury claimants. In an opposition filed with the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the company argued that the case differed fundamentally from the earlier filing. It emphasized the unprecedented commitment to $8.9 billion from J&J, the largest settlement ever in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. Not mentioned: how this amount implies that it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from various plaintiffs’ law firms that represent over 60,000 claimants. This is not easy to confirm but it’s likely to be false.

May 24 2023 Update: Following Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the very first trial on its cosmetic talc products allegedly containing asbestos is set to commence jury selection on Monday, California at Alameda County Superior Court, which is a well-known location for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma was caused by asbestos exposure through J&J’s products, an allegation the company denies. The trial also involves six retailers who are accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the second J&J Talc bankruptcy are disputing who should be chosen to fill the role of a the future claims representative, an important role essential to the resolution of the claims involving talc. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs all over the nation was appointed as the claims representative in the previous bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be appointed in that position again, but lawyers for the talc plaintiffs have raised objections due to the fact that Ellis has conflicts of interest that should prevent her from holding that position once more. The dispute stems from reality that Ellis was reportedly involved in drafting the hotly disputable second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her ability to be neutral. The reality is the bankruptcy will be dismissed regardless.

May 17, 2023 Update The fake company J&J formed for the talc litigation bankruptcy disclosed to a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they had allocated $400 million to settle the allegations made by states who accuse the company of deceitful advertising for its talc-based products. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It’s hard to imagine the scenario in which J&J could push these baby powder settlements through at these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer might seem like a lot of money at first, it does not look great when you consider the math. This settlement proposal – by our rough calculations, would not pay victims much more than a median settlement of $100,000 per instance. It’s not enough.

May 15, 2023 update: J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit brought by an advocacy group representing cancer patients. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. The group argues that J&J intentionally canceled an $61.5 billion contract for funding together with its parent company, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and to validate the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims that this move could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of victims’ compensation rights. They plan to explore J&J’s actions in the wake of the dismissal of LTL’s first bankruptcy case.

May 10 2023 Update: The following week this week, it is expected that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a petition to dismiss the second bankruptcy filing that was filed by J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. However, in the meantime, this bankruptcy court has issued an Order that requires both parties to participate in a settlement mediation in the hope that the global settlement can be brokered.

May 5 2023 Update: The talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging its talc products caused cancer through asbestos exposure. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. Over 2700 people have sued the firm, and it was spending $1 million a month for legal defense. The company’s recent $29million settlement in South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing for a fair distribution of assets between talc claimants rather than being taken over through the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also declared bankruptcy because of lawsuits.

May 4, 2023 update: U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch talks on settlement with lawyers who rebuffed Johnson & Johnson’s $8.9 billion offer for settlement. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared in court to discuss the next steps for their second bankruptcy matter and Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.

This is the way to settle these claims with J&J. A baby powder settlement could get done. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. But it will require more money, more billions of dollars of Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers have a split opinion on whether to accept the proposal and not all clients see the issue the same way their lawyer views it. This second case of bankruptcy is likely to fail, as Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to decide whether to dismiss the bankruptcy for the second time.

May 3 2023 Update A group of cancer victims suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested for they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt litigation over talc products. The group of talc claimants submitted a motion on Tuesday requesting for the Third Circuit to consider their appeal and return the case the lower court with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. The committee also requested that the lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J be allowed to proceed.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again following the bankruptcy filing it made earlier was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year, offering the possibility of an $8.9 billion payment. The committee argues that the recent ruling which allowed LTL’s third Chapter 11 to continue, and also stopping trials against J&J, warrants urgent Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also requested that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J plans to file a reply in the appeals court, calling the request a “desperate and legally deficient attempt” by a select group of law firms who have different financial interests.
May 1, 2023 Update: One question people keep asking is how plaintiffs and their lawyers be able to turn down $8.9 billion. Of course, it’s a lot of money. But there are plenty of victims. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. These are an excellent arguments for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently in two talc trials which have resulted in huge verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February, a talcum powder mesothelioma trial in Oregon led to the verdict that was $18.1 million. The following month, a second talc mesothelioma case went to trial at South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million in favor of plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the top producers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th, 2023 Update: When J&J initially tried to take the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it did so with an offer to put aside $2 billion for settlements. The amount was absurdly low. None of the talc plaintiffs agreed with the offer. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs are willing to accept bankruptcy settlements and also has the support of a substantial portion of the talc plaintiffs as well as their lawyers. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. But 75% of the talc plaintiffs, which is needed for approval of the bankruptcy plan It’s a long and difficult process because of the number of lawyers who have large collections of baby powder lawsuits opposed in favor of the deal.

What is the solution to this impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 Update: Talc Cancer victims have requested a judge to disqualify their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly-made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially strained. LTL requested Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January, saying the company wasn’t eligible for bankruptcy relief because it had not demonstrated financial difficulties.

The plaintiffs argue that LTL’s third Chapter 11 case is an misuse of the bankruptcy system and that the case is being handled in bad faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from companies representing approximately 60,000 people who are claiming. It is fair to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are not united over what they believe is an $8.9 billion offer for settlement.

April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has ruled that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that it offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. Even though trials for the talc lawsuits have been suspended for a minimum period of 60 days however, new lawsuits may be filed and lawyers are able to begin preparing their cases. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its strategy by filing the second bankruptcy case.

April 13 2023 Update: most important news is the $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years offer for settlement. Lawyers representing cancer victims involved in MDL class action MDL class action have pledged to fight the settlement along with those who claim talc. Why? They believe it’s not enough money for more than 70,000 cancer victims. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. They argue that J&J could negotiate a greater settlement or pursue individuals’ claims if the current bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

But there’s a separate group of lawyers that is not part of the leadership of this class action. These lawyers have amassed many thousands of cases. This group wants to settle now in what many believe to be less than the victims deserve. Their argument is twofold. First, they argue the settlement, which is about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

That is a hard argument to argue. But their second argument has more teeth: victims can now not wait and they want their money today.

April 12, 2023 Update: People are wondering if J&J could file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complex and confusing. But let’s try to explain it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only method to resolve both current and future talc litigations in a definitive manner. That is, it believes it can pay less in the event of the bankruptcy element which applies pressure for a settlement. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. Moving past more than 400 years in American time, the business argues that bankruptcy benefits all parties because it distributes settlement payments more evenly and more efficiently than trial courts where litigants are awarded significant payouts, while others are left with nothing.

The gist of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – an enterprise that is profitable, forming subsidiaries to meet the legal risk and declare bankruptcy – Congress considered when it was drafting the Bankruptcy Code. It also clarified that the subsidiary was not in financial crisis because J&J promises unlimited funding.
Then J&J jumped on the funding unlimited part of the holding and didn’t promise to provide unlimited funding for lawsuits. The company claims that modified financing arrangements with its subsidiary addresses the concerns of the appellate court, while offering funds to pay claims. As if providing victims with lower amounts of money would resolve the underlying issue.

Lawyers representing cancer victims who are against the agreement argue this by arguing that the plaintiff is the legal argument. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. They counter with legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous ruling. The hyperbole wasn’t spared: victims’ lawyers call this the biggest “fraudulent transaction in United States history.”

In spite of the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe this bankruptcy will be able to last. However, it’s a means of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement and keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023, Update Bloomberg has an interesting article about a new law within New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the plaintiffs in the class action. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) regarding talc products, in exchange for a portion of any profits. J&J has now offered the payment of $8.9 billion to settle all lawsuits.

The involvement of the funders is made public because of a New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about funding sources outside of the. The rule aims to address the rising calls for the regulation of litigation funders. J&J has more than 60,000 claims when you take into account federal and state Baby Powder lawsuits. Third-party financing in mass tort cases is not without its pros and cons. But there is no question that we are witnessing the ways that third-party funding can even the playing field between individuals and big companies in the courtroom.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s enjoyable to see the worm turn in this legal battle. J&J suffered another setback this week when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to extend the automatic stay during the time that J&J appeals an order granting bankruptcy in the U.S. Supreme Court. The automatic stay has frozen thousands of talcum powder cases and prevented new lawsuits from being filed ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc debts off into a bankrupt subsidiary more than one year back. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. When it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal a few months ago, the stay was revoked. J&J had hoped to have it continue in the meantime of the SCOTUS appeal. But the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that of the Supreme Court is willing even to take up the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay having been in effect, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action involving talcum powder MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc lawsuits were included in the MDL over the last month which brings the total number of pending cases up to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) launch an investigation to determine how much J&J talc products have cost the government over the decades.
in a letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of ignoring the dangers of its talc product for decades while tax dollars were spent on treating people who suffered injuries from exposure to the chemicals. This lawsuit comes a few weeks after J&J’s major loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. J&J needs to start making reasonable settlement offers to victims to in putting this behind. This is a disgrace to one of the most prestigious firms.

February 14 2023 Update: In an appearance today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Langan v. Johnson & Johnson settlement. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

Langan V. Johnson & Johnson Settlement >>

<< Langan V. Johnson & Johnson Settlement

  • Talcum Powder Lawsuit Attorney Decatur Al – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Newspaper Online Free Marriage Divorce – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Oregon Online Divorce Forms – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Are Connecticut Divorce Records Available Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Is Talc In Cornstarch Baby Powder – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Johnson And Johnson Risperdal Settlement – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Do I Need A Copy Of My Divorce Papers To Marry In Florida – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • File For Divorce In Georgia Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Johnsons Baby Talc Travel Size – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Free Online Divorce Mo Laywer Consultaiom – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • You May Also Like

    About the Author: Spider Mitch

    Langan V Johnson & Johnson Settlement – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

    You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

    J&J’s proposed talc settlement will provide 400 million dollars to US state AGs. Langan V Johnson & Johnson Settlement .

    Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set the amount of $400 million for resolving U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its broader $8.9 billion settlement of allegations that it’s Baby Powder and other talc-based products cause cancer. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement.

    J&J affiliate LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm intends to pay for different types of cancer sufferers in an arrangement for bankruptcy. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. J&J has said that its products containing talc are safe and do not cause cancer. J&J is seeking the second time to end more than 38,000 lawsuits filed in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from being filed in the future.
    LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims made from state attorney generals alleging that J&J was in violation of states’ unfair practices and consumer protection laws by misleading consumers regarding the safety of its talc products.

    Many states had initiated consumer protection lawsuits against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing stopped those investigations from progressing in 2021. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought suits for damages against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative requests or subpoenas according to court documents.

     

     

    New Mexico and Mississippi have decided to declare LTL’s bankruptcy unfinished in a joint move with cancer victims and those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They have argued that a successful company such as J&J can’t benefit from bankruptcy protections aimed at those struggling with debt.
    The company’s initial attempt to resolve the bankruptcy cases was rejected after the same arguments. A U.S. appellate court ruled the LTL did not have “financial difficulty” and ineligible to receive bankruptcy relief. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time in just two hours following the dismissal, arguing its second attempt was different in that there was less money available and more support for the settlement.

    New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates the state’s law enforcement authority in attempting to unilaterally limit the company’s liability for state consumer protection laws.

     

    Langan V Johnson & Johnson Settlement

    LTL’s recent filings also provided more information about the way in which the company will evaluate and settle cancer claims if the bankruptcy plan is approved.

    The maximum amount under the settlement will be $500,000 for those diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to age 45 and $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with terminal ovarian cancer before age 45.

    The proposed settlement provides discounts based on the kind and severity of cancer, the individual’s age, previous talc use and other factors. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. For instance the case of a woman who used daily talc products, had the family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed with an ovarian cancer stage II when she was 55 may qualify for a $21,125 payout according to the plan.

    Judge decides J&J and talc oppositionists to take part in settlement talks.

    After another round of hearings in Johnson &Johnson’s attempt to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company as well as those who oppose the strategy to engage in negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

    In its second bankruptcy effort for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to settle claims – the company offered a settlement of $8.9 billion. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. While a group of law firms representing plaintiffs support the offer, another group is opposed to the offer.

    In the last week, an opposition group, dubbed”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants requested the bankruptcy court to dismiss this case by argument that LTL cannot be regarded as in financial distress.

    “The filing is an incredibly legal and ineffective attempt by a small number of law firms to try to block claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants favor,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. “The law firms that are behind these filings have interests in finance that conflict with, diverge from and infringe on the rights of their clients. We’ll submit a response in the appeals court.”

    Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which is home to more than mesothelioma clients who have sued J&J, said that J&J’s second bankruptcy attempt will fail.

    “J&J issue press releases about how great its plans are, but is requesting that details of the plan, such as what each sick person will receive,” Thompson said in a statement. “What do they have to conceal?”

     

     

    Kaplan has directed the parties to develop a new strategy for reorganization, under the supervision by two mediators.

    On February 20, 2022 Kaplan affirmed the ability of J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve J&J from the thousands of lawsuits over its talcum products.

    However, in January of this year, an appeals court of the federal government overturned the decision, deciding that the firm could not be considered to be in “financial difficulty.”

    In the event that J&J’s request to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was turned down on April 1, J&J applied for its first bankruptcy two hours later. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether to allow the second bankruptcy.

    J&J’s unstoppable profit machine sputters after $6.9B settlement charge for talc.

    With Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has purchased 19 months of which cases were placed suspended. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. The company would like claimants to vote on accepting their settlement. J&J will require 75% of the vote for the settlement to be approved.

    In addition to the group of talc lawyers who panned the company’s bankruptcy play in the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Trustee is an arm that is part of the U.S. Department of Justice, also filed motions to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

    In a letter filed this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the the bankruptcy court remain “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” Those doors “are not accessible to those that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy objective or seek to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors.” Vara continued.

    On the other hand, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their talc products, including its popular baby powder cause cancer. J&J has been taking the products of the market, first on North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

    J&J wants to avoid the expense of going to trial. It has won the majority of cases that have been resolved at trial, but certain losses have been harsh.
    A high-profile trial in Missouri resulted in a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug company and was later lowered to $2.1 billion following appeals.

    Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
    In all, J&J has lost nine cases involving talc, which are appealing or settled. Out of 41 trials, 32 of them ended in the favor of J&J either through a mistrial or plaintiff verdicts that were overturned in appeal. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. In addition, J&J in 2020 moved to settle around 1,000 cases for the sum of $100 million. Bloomberg stated at the time.

     

    Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Langan V Johnson & Johnson Settlement

    Our lawyers are handling baby powder cases in every state. The lawsuits involving talcum powder against Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products such as the Baby Powder along with Shower to Shower, can cause ovarian cancer among some women.

    This page provides an J&J Talc Power Update and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling will affect the final settlement amount of the Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

    Is the deadline for you to make a claim for talcum powder? Many who assume the statute of limitations has passed to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Contact us now at 800-553-8082 or request a free and quick review of your case online.

     

    Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Langan V Johnson & Johnson Settlement

    June 2 2023 Update: In an asbestos talc court trial held that took place in California yesterday, technical glitches interrupted the opening statement by the defense attorneys. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. The jurors, attending at home via Zoom, did hear Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his doubt about the 70s research affirming the presence of asbestos in their product, but the opening was abruptly ended.

    The plaintiff had the opportunity to present an initial witness Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of additional minerals along with talc is inevitable. He claimed that his group informed J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos in the talc of the company, but at lower than 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in 1976.

    June 1st, 2023 Update Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. The first trial since J&J has decided to separate its talc division, and then declare bankrupt is an important point for the ongoing litigation controversy. The trial started yesterday in the heartbreaking case of a young, 24-year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma last year. an illness that lawyers on both sides acknowledge is a grave tragedy.

    The opening statements exposed the huge differences between the sides’ story. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive techniques in its research practices and throughout the litigation process. The attorney claims that, according to the company attempted to manipulate asbestos’ definition, despite internal documents from between 1978 and 1994 that showed asbestos fibers in the tissues of the plaintiff are part of.

    Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement is hanging in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the distinct nature of this mesothelioma lawsuit and its distinct issues compared to most talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could result in the company with a major setback in its hope of gaining broad acceptance for their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.

    May 31st 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc business strongly defended it’s 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from victims of talc injuries. In a written objection to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, it argued that the situation was vastly different from the previous filing. It emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion by J&J as the largest ever settlement in a mass tort bankruptcy case. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. There was no mention of how this amount means it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed support from several plaintiffs’ legal firms representing more than sixty thousand claimants. It is difficult to confirm however it is likely to be incorrect.

    May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the very first trial regarding the cosmetic talc products it claims to comprised of asbestos is set to commence jury selection on Monday in California with Alameda County Superior Court, which is a well-known jurisdiction for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims that his mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure through J&J’s products which that the company does not deny. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc products.

    May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the second J&J talc bankruptcy are battling over who should be appointed to the role of future claims representative, an important role essential to the resolution of the talc claims. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the country was appointed as the claims representative in the previous bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be appointed in that position again, but lawyers for the plaintiffs in talc are arguing because Ellis has a conflict of interest that would prevent her from being appointed to that post in the future. The conflict stems from the issue that Ellis was apparently involved in the drafting of the highly disputable second bankruptcy, which raises questions about her capacity to be neutral. In reality, this bankruptcy is likely to be dismissed in the end.

    May 17, 2023 Update: The fake company J&J put together to settle the talc litigation bankruptcy has informed the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million to settle the allegations made by states who accuse the company of deceptive advertising for its talc-based products. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. It’s a $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It’s hard to imagine an eventuality where J&J can get the baby powder settlements at these numbers. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer sounds like a large sum initially, it may not look great when you look at the numbers. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations, would not provide victims with much more than $100,000 per case. That is not enough.

    May 15 2023, Update J&J could be facing suit from an advocacy group representing cancer patients. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. The group contends that J&J intentionally canceled a $61.5 billion contract for funding with its subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and to validate the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group argues that this act is equivalent to a fraudulent transfer of rights of compensation for victims. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions in the wake of the denial of LTL’s first bankruptcy case.

    May 10 2023 Update: The following week in next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion dismiss the second bankruptcy filing from J&J subsidiary LTL Management. In the meantime, this bankruptcy court has issued an order that requires both parties to take part in a settlement mediation in the hope that it will be possible to reach a global settlement agreement come to fruition.

    May 5, 2023 Update: The talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to several lawsuits alleging that its talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. Over 2,700 people have sued the firm, and it was spending $1 million a month on legal defense. The company’s most recent $29 million verdict that was handed down in South Carolina forced it to file for bankruptcy protection, arguing for a fair distribution of assets between the claimants of talc instead of being taken over from the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also filed for bankruptcy due to lawsuits.

    May 4 2023 update: U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to resume negotiations with lawyers who rejected the company’s proposed $8.9 billion settlement offer. The court in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared in court to discuss next steps for this second case of bankruptcy and Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.

    This is the best way to resolve these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement could get done. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. However, it will require more money, more billions of dollars of Johnson & Johnson.

    Lawyers are split on whether or not to accept the plan and not all clients see the issue the same way their lawyer views it. A second bankruptcy proceeding is likely to be a failure the judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to determine if she will close the case for the third time.

    May 3, 2023 Update: A group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked an order from the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to derail the litigation involving talc products. The group representing the claimants has filed a motion this week, asking that the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back before a court of lower jurisdiction, with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. They also asked that the lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J continue to proceed.
    LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again after its first bankruptcy filing was denied in the Third Circuit earlier this year with a $8.9 billion agreement. The committee says that the recent ruling, which allows LTL’s third Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J, warrants urgent Third Circuit review. The US Trustee has also requested be the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J intends to file a formal response to the appeals court declaring the filing a “desperate and legally deficient attempt” by a small number of law firms that have conflicts of financial interests.
    May 1st 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how could plaintiffs and their attorneys turn off $8.9 billion. Of course, that is a lot of money. There are a lot of victims. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. They are a great case for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week in two talc trials which resulted in big verdicts for plaintiffs. In February, a talcum powder mesothelioma trial in Oregon was settled with a verdict that was $18.1 million. A month later, another mesothelioma trial involving talc was held for trial within South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29 million in favor of plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc., one of the leading suppliers of talc in the U.S.
    April 30th, 2023 Update: When J&J first tried to bring the talcum powder lawsuit into bankruptcy, it did so with an offer to set aside $2 billion for settlements. The sum was ridiculously low. None of the talc plaintiffs agreed with the offer. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs are willing to accept bankruptcy settlements and they also have the support of a large segment of the talc plaintiffs as well as their lawyers. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. But 75% of the plaintiffs in the talc category, which is required for bankruptcy plan approval, it a tough road since there are so many lawyers with large stocks of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed in favor of the deal.

    What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
    April 25, 2023, Update Talc patients have demanded a judge dismiss the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially distressed. LTL requested Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January The court ruled that the company was not eligible for bankruptcy relief since it was unable to demonstrate financial stress.

    The plaintiffs argue that LTL’s third Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system and the case is being handled in bad faith. J&J says the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant support” from firms representing approximately 60,000 plaintiffs. It’s safe to say that lawyers representing plaintiffs and victims ‘ lawyers are divided on their disagreement over the $8.9 billion deal.

    April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has ruled that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. Even though trials for the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for a minimum of 60 days however, new lawsuits may be filed, and lawyers can begin preparing their cases. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its plan with another bankruptcy case.

    April 13th 2023 update: the major news is the $8.9 billion over the next 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer victims in the MDL Class Action have vowed to fight the settlement alongside Talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s not enough for more than 70,000 cancer victims. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. These lawyers believe that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or even litigate individual claims if the most recent bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

    There is a different set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership of that class action. These lawyers have amassed hundreds of thousands of cases. This group wants to settle now in what many believe to be less than the victims deserve. Their argument appears to be two-fold. First, they argue the settlement – about 100,000 dollars per plaintiff – is fair.

    It’s a difficult argument to prove. However, their second argument has more force: the victims can no longer wait and want their money now.

    April 12 2023 Update: Many are asking how J&J can file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complicated and complex. Let’s try to clarify it in simple terms.
    Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only method to resolve both current and future talc litigations in a definitive manner. That is, it believes it can pay less if there is a bankruptcy component that applies pressure to settle. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. In a quest to cover more than 400 years in American history, the company asserts that bankruptcy benefits all parties by distributing settlement payments more equitably and more efficiently than trial courts in which some litigants receive substantial awards while others receive nothing.

    The gist in this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – an enterprise that is profitable, forming a subsidiary to take the legal liability and declare bankruptcy – something Congress had in mind when it came to drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled it was not in financial trouble because J&J offered unlimited financing.
    Then J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the unlimited funding part of the contract and didn’t promise that it would provide unlimited funds for litigation. J&J claims that its modified financing arrangements with its subsidiary will address appeals court’s concerns, while providing funds for claims. In the hope that offering victims less money will solve the problem at hand.

    Attorneys representing cancer patients who oppose the agreement counter this by arguing that the plaintiff is the legal argument. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. They counter with legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets to LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous decision. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed by the victims’ lawyers, who call it the biggest “fraudulent transaction of assets in United States history.”

    Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. But it is a way to try and push the $8.9 billion settlement, and to keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

    April 10, 2023, Update Bloomberg provides an insightful article on a new law that has been passed in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the baby powder Class action suit. The funders who fund litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged for a share of any settlements. J&J is now willing that it will pay $8.9 billion to settle any lawsuits.

    The involvement of the funders is public information because of the New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about funders outside the state. The law is designed to address the rising calls for regulation of litigation funders. J&J faces over 60,000 claims when you take into account state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party financing in mass tort cases is not without its pros and pros and. But there is no question that we are witnessing how third-party funding could level the playing field between individuals as well as large corporations in the courtroom.

    April 4 2023 Update: It is interesting to watch the worm turn in this lawsuit. J&J took another hit this week, when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to extend the automatic stay during the time that J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court. Automatic stays have frozen thousands of talcum powder cases and prevented new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin the talc debts into a bankrupt entity over a year ago. Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was invalid some months ago, the stay was revoked. J&J had hoped to have it continue in the meantime of its SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
    April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The chance the Supreme Court is willing even to take up the appeal? Low.
    March 16 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay being in effect, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the talcum powder class action MDL in over one year. Seven new talc lawsuits have been added to the MDL during the month of March which brings the total number of cases pending to 37,522.

    February 25 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that authorities from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) begin an investigation into the cost J&J products containing talc have cost the government in the decades.
    Recently, in an open letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) in a recent letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten. J&J of failing to recognize the dangers of its talc product for long while tax dollars utilized to treat people injured by exposure to the product. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. J&J has to begin making reasonable settlements to victims, in order to put all of this behind it. It’s a mark on one of the greatest businesses.

    February 14 , 2023 Update: At an appearance today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of his 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

     

    You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Langan v Johnson & Johnson settlement. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

     

    Langan V Johnson & Johnson Settlement >>

    << Langan V Johnson & Johnson Settlement

  • Talc Exposure And Mesothelioma – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • How To Start Divorce Proceedings In South Carolina When Spouse Lives In Florida – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Ohio Divorce Laws Online File Only – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Mn Online Divorce – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Does Shower To Shower Contain Talc – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Free Online Divorce Record Search Nc – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Jonhson Johnson Talc Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Talco Causa Cancer De Ovario – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Michigan Online Divorce Record – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Online Divorce Papers Louisiana Free – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • You May Also Like

    About the Author: Spider Mitch