You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Pinaud talc asbestos. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement will be worth $440 million US state AGs. Pinaud Talc Asbestos .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to address U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a broader $8.9 billion deal to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder and other talc-based items cause cancer. Pinaud talc asbestos.

J&J subsidiaries LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday which outlines how the company intends to pay for different types of cancer victims as part of bankruptcy settlement. Pinaud talc asbestos. J&J has said that its products containing talc are safe and will not cause cancer. The company is trying for another time to settle more than 38,000 lawsuits in bankruptcy and stop new cases from coming forward in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plans would deposit $400 million into an additional trust to settle lawsuits filed in state courts by attorneys general claiming that J&J violated states’ unfair practices as well as consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers regarding the safety of its talc products.

Several states had begun consumer protection cases against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from progressing in 2021. Pinaud talc asbestos. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed actions for damages against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative requests or subpoenas in LTL’s court filings.

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy along with cancer sufferers and those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who have argued that a profitable firm like J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections intended for those struggling with debt.
The first attempt by LTL to resolve the lawsuits in bankruptcy was thrown out after similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court determined in favor of LTL wasn’t in “financial distress” and was not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief. Pinaud talc asbestos. LTL filed a second bankruptcy within two hours of the dismissal, saying that the second bankruptcy was different due to the fact that it was able to borrow less and more backing for the settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s renewed bankruptcy violates the law enforcement powers of the state in attempting to unilaterally limit LTL’s liability to state consumer protection actions.

Pinaud Talc Asbestos

The filings of LTL’s latest bankruptcy proceedings also include more information about the way in which the company will evaluate and pay for cancer claims when the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The highest payments under the settlement will be $500,000 for people diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before age 45 and $260,000 for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer that is terminal prior to age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement applies discounts depending on the type and severity of cancer, an individual’s age, history of using talc and other factors. Pinaud talc asbestos. For example, a woman who used talc products weekly, had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer, and was diagnosed with an ovarian cancer stage II at age 55 could be in line for a $21,125 payout according to the plan.

Judge orders J&J and talc oppositionists to participate in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson and Johnson’s efforts to employ a Texas Two Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the firm and the people who opposed the move to conduct talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

In its second bankruptcy effort for LTL management, a subsidiary founded by J&J to manage the claims company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Pinaud talc asbestos. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs support the offer, another group opposes the move.

In the last week, an opposition group, dubbed”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants and urging the bankruptcy court to disqualify the petition by saying that LTL cannot be regarded as in financial hardship.

“The filing is an unjust and legally flawed attempt by a handful of law firms to try to stop claimants from deciding on the resolution, which that the overwhelming majority of claimants support,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Pinaud talc asbestos. “The law firms involved in this filing have financial interests that conflict with, diverge from and oppose the interests they represent. We’ll be submitting an appeal in the appeals court.”

Pinaud talc asbestos. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which has more than 80 mesothelioma victims who have filed lawsuits against J&J and J&J, has said that J&J’s second bankruptcy effort is likely to fail.

“J&J sends out press releases about how great its plan is while simultaneously insisting that the details of its plan–including the treatment the individual sick individuals would receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in an announcement. “What do they have to keep secret?”

Kaplan has commanded the parties to come up with another reorganization plan, under the supervision from two mediators.

In February 2022, Kaplan affirmed the ability of J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve J&J from the tens of thousands of claims over its talcum products.

But in the month of January, an appeals court of the federal government overturned the ruling, ruling that the business could not be considered to be in “financial difficulty.”

After J&J’s challenge the U.S. Supreme Court was turned down the same month, J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy two hours later. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 calendar days to decide whether or not to approve an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit machine sputters after $6.9B settlement charge for talc.

Through two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which cases were placed suspended. Pinaud talc asbestos. The company is requesting that claimants decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J needs 75% of the vote for the deal to pass.

In addition to the team of talc lawyers that criticized the company’s bankruptcy and the U.S. Trustee, an arm that is part of the U.S. Department of Justice has also filed a motion to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a filing this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the the bankruptcy court are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” Those doors “are not available to anyone that lack a legitimate bankruptcy purpose or that seek to use the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors.” Vara continued.

In its own words, J&J maintains there is no conclusive evidence that its Talc products, which includes its famous baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market–first on North America in 2020–and the rest of the world later this year.

J&J seeks to avoid the expense of going to trial. It has won the majority of cases that have been decided during trial, however, some losses have been very punitive.
A highly-publicized trial in Missouri ended in an $4.7 billion judgment against the drug manufacturer, which was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are on appeal or have been decided. Out of 41 trials 32 have ended in an outcome for J&J or a mistrial, or verdict of a plaintiff annulled on appeal. Pinaud talc asbestos. In addition, J&J in 2020 sought to settle nearly 1000 cases at a cost of the sum of $100 million. Bloomberg announced at that time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Pinaud Talc Asbestos

Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits across all 50 states. The talcum powder lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Pinaud talc asbestos. The lawsuits allege that prolonged use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products like baby Powder as well as Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause ovarian cancer in certain women.

This page offers an J&J talc power litigation update and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amount of the ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Has the deadline passed for you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many who believe that the statute of limitations has passed to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or request a free and quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Pinaud Talc Asbestos

June 2 2023 Update: At the asbestos talc trial which took place in California yesterday, technical glitches interrupted the opening statement by the defense lawyers. Pinaud talc asbestos. Jurors who were watching from home via Zoom, did hear Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his doubt about the science of the 70s asserting the presence of asbestos in their product prior to the opening was abruptly ended.

In the meantime, the plaintiff was able to introduce the first of their witnesses, Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of other minerals with the talc mineral is a given. He also testified that his team advised J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc manufactured by the company, though with just 0.1 percent. The asbestos was discovered by him in the year 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update Pinaud talc asbestos. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J decided to spin off its Talc division and declare bankruptcy marks an important turning point for the ongoing litigation controversy. The trial started yesterday in the heartbreaking trial of a young plaintiff, diagnosed with a rare and aggressive type of mesothelioma last year. which both sides of the argument agree is a harrowing tragedy.

Opening statements laid bare stark differences in each side’s story. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive techniques in its research practices and throughout the litigation procedure. The attorney claims that, according to, Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter the definition of asbestos, in spite of internal documents from the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that asbestos fibers that were found in the plaintiff’s tissue are included.

Johnson &J’s highly uncertain $8.9 billion settlement offer hangs in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the unique nature of this mesothelioma case and its unique challenges compared to the majority of talcum powder lawsuits and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could inflict a serious setback to J&J’s hope of gaining broad acceptance for the settlement they have proposed among plaintiffs.

May 31 2023: Update from Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit is defending it’s two-time Chapter 11 filing in the in the face of challenges from victims of talc injuries. In an objection submitted to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the filing differed fundamentally from the prior filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion in settlement from J&J the largest settlement ever made in the history of a mass tort bankruptcy. Pinaud talc asbestos. It was not mentioned how this amount means it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from numerous plaintiffs’ law firms representing more than the 60,000 plaintiffs. This is hard to verify but likely incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the very first trial regarding its cosmetic talc items allegedly that contain asbestos is scheduled to start jury selection Monday in California within the Alameda County Superior Court, which is a well-known court for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure from J&J’s products which J&J denies. The trial also includes six retailers who are accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are disputing who should be chosen to fill the role of the future claims representative, the role is crucially essential to the resolution of the talc claims. Pinaud talc asbestos. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs all over the nation was appointed the claims representative in the previous bankruptcy. J&J’s defense attorneys want Ellis to be appointed to this position and again, but attorneys for the plaintiffs in talc are arguing to the claim that Ellis has a conflict of interest which would prohibit her from holding that position in the future. This conflict is rooted in the fact that Ellis was apparently involved in the drafting of the highly litigated second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her ability to be neutral. However, the reality is that the bankruptcy will be dismissed in the end.

May 17, 2023 Update The fake company J&J created for the talc litigation bankruptcy informed an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million as a settlement for claims made by states accusing J&J of misleading marketing for its talc product. Pinaud talc asbestos. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It is hard to imagine an eventuality where J&J will be able to push these baby powder settlements through at these numbers. Although J&J’s $8.5 billion offer seems like a lot of money initially, it will not look very appealing when you consider the math. The proposed settlement based on our estimates – will not provide victims with much more than $100,000 per case. It’s not enough.

May 15, 2023, Update J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit brought by an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Pinaud talc asbestos. The group claims J&J deliberately retracted a $61.5 billion financing agreement together with its parent company, LTL Management LLC, in order to create a false sense of financial distress and verify the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group asserts this action is a fraud transfer of the rights of compensation for victims. They will investigate J&J’s actions following of the denial of LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week next week, it is expected that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion reject the second bankruptcy filing of J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. However, in the meantime LTL Management has filed an Order which requires both sides to participate in a new settlement mediation in the hope that it will be possible to reach a global settlement agreement been reached.

May 5th 2023 Update: The talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to many lawsuits claiming that its talc products cause cancer from asbestos exposure. Pinaud talc asbestos. Over 2700 people have sued the firm and it has been paying $1 million per month to defend its legal position. The company’s latest $29 million verdict on the state of South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing that assets should be distributed in an equitable manner between talc claimants rather than being taken over in the hands of the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of litigation.

May 4 2023, Update U.S. The bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to restart settlement discussions with lawyers who rebuffed the company’s $8.9 billion settlement offer. The court in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties gathered in court to discuss next steps in another bankruptcy proceeding. Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.

This is the solution to resolve these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement can be made. Pinaud talc asbestos. However, it will require additional money – perhaps billions of dollars coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided on whether to accept the proposal and not all clients see the situation the same way their lawyer views it. The second bankruptcy case is destined to fail as Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to determine if she will close the case for the third time.

May 3 2023 Update The group of cancer victims who are suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested that J&J’s Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt litigation over talc products. The group representing the claimants submitted a motion on Tuesday, asking that the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back to a lower court, with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Pinaud talc asbestos. The committee also requested that the halted tort litigation against J&J continue to proceed.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its first bankruptcy filing was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year, offering the possibility of an $8.9 billion deal. The committee says that the recent ruling which allowed LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, as well as halting the trials against J&J, warrants immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also asked that be the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J plans to file a formal response to the appeals court declaring the filing an “desperate and legally insufficient move” by a few of law firms that have competing financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers turn around $8.9 billion. That’s of course an immense amount of money. But there are a lot of victims. Pinaud talc asbestos. These are actually a good claims for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently in two talc trials which resulted in big verdicts for plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon resulted in the verdict in the amount of $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma-related talc case went to trial within South Carolina and resulted in the verdict of $29 million to the plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. One of the top suppliers of talc within the U.S.
April 30, 2023 Update: When J&J first attempted to drag the talcum powder lawsuit into bankruptcy, it did so with the option of putting aside $2 billion to settle the case. It was a ridiculously small amount. The talc plaintiffs had not believed in the proposal. This time, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs will allow a bankruptcy settlement and they also have the support of a substantial section of the talc victims and their lawyers. Pinaud talc asbestos. But with 75% of talc plaintiffs, which is necessary for bankruptcy plan approval is a difficult road with so many lawyers with massive inventory of baby powder-related lawsuits, opposed to the settlement.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023, Update Talc patients have sought a court order to dismiss the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly-made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially troubled. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders caused cancer. Pinaud talc asbestos. In the end, however, the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January in a ruling that said LTL was not a candidate to receive bankruptcy relief because it did not show financial trouble.

The claimants contend that the 2nd Chapter 11 case is an fraud on the bankruptcy system and it is being pursued in bad faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from the firms that represent around 60,000 people who are claiming. It is fair to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and the victims are split over their disagreement over the $8.9 billion deal.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge ruled that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the company offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. Although the trials for Talc lawsuits are suspended for at least 60 calendar days however, new lawsuits may be filed, and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Pinaud talc asbestos. Judges expressed doubt about J&J’s attempt to revive its strategy with another bankruptcy case.

April 13 2023 update: the big announcement is an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer victims who are part of MDL class action MDL collective action vowed to fight the settlement with the talc claimants. Why? They believe it’s too little money for the 70 000 cancer patients. Pinaud talc asbestos. These lawyers believe that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or pursue individuals’ claims if the current bankruptcy is dismissed.

But there’s a separate group of lawyers outside of the top leadership in group action. These lawyers have amassed many thousands of cases. The group is seeking to settle today in what many believe to be lower than what the victims should be paid. Their argument appears to be two-fold. The first is that they claim the settlement of around the equivalent of $100,000 per plaintiff is fair.

This is an argument that is difficult to make. But their second argument has more force: the victims can no longer wait and want their money today.

April 12 2023 Update: Some people are seeking out how J&J is able to file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complex and confusing. However, let’s attempt to explain it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only option to resolve both current and future talc litigations in a definitive manner. That is, it believes it can pay less in the event of a bankruptcy element that creates pressure to negotiate a settlement. Pinaud talc asbestos. Driving past more than 400 years in American history, the company claims that bankruptcy benefits all parties as it distributes settlements more equally and effectively than trial courts where litigants are awarded significant awards while others receive nothing.

The essence in the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a matter of one that makes a profit, but a subsidiary to take the legal liability and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress contemplated when drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled that the entity was financially distress due to the fact that J&J offered unlimited financing.
This is why J&J decided to go with the funding unlimited part of the agreement but did not pledge to provide unlimited funding for cases. J&J claims that its updated financing arrangements with its subsidiary will address appeals court’s concerns, while offering funds to pay claims. It’s as if giving victims less money would solve the problem at hand.

Lawyers representing cancer victims who oppose the agreement counter this with what you conclude is countering legal nonsense legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets to LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier decision. Hyperbole was not spared the lawyers representing victims call it the most significant “fraudulent transaction that has occurred in United States history.”

Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe this bankruptcy will be able to last. However, it’s a means of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement to keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 update: Bloomberg is running an intriguing article about a new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the plaintiffs in the class action. The funders who fund litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange for a share of any wins. J&J has now offered to pay $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is public knowledge because of a New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about funders outside the state. The rules aim to address the growing calls for the regulation of lawsuit funders. J&J has more than 60,000 claims when you take into account state and federal child powder-related lawsuits. Third-party financing in mass tort cases has its pros and cons. However, there is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party funding could level the playing field for individuals and large corporations in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s enjoyable to see the worm turn in this litigation. J&J suffered another setback this week when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place during the time that J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court. Automatic stays have halted thousands of talcum powder cases and prevented the filing of new lawsuits ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin talc-related liabilities off into a bankrupt subsidiary over one year back. Pinaud talc asbestos. After the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid some months ago, the stay was revoked. J&J had hoped to have it remain in effect until hearing the SCOTUS appeal. But the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The likelihood that of the Supreme Court is willing even to accept the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay in effect, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the class action involving talcum powder MDL in over one year. Seven new talc lawsuits have been added to the MDL over the last month which brings the total number of cases pending to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) initiate an investigation to determine how much J&J products containing talc have cost the government over the decades.
A recent email addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) has accused J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc product for long while tax dollars utilized to treat people injured by exposure to the product. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Pinaud talc asbestos. J&J must begin making reasonable settlement offers to victims, in order in putting this behind it. This is a blemish on one of the world’s greatest firms.

February 14 2023 Update: During an appearance today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.