You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Why talc free baby powder. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement with talc would provide 400 million dollars to US state AGs. Why Talc Free Baby Powder .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its larger $8.9 billion plan to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder and other talc-based ingredients cause cancer. Why talc free baby powder.

J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that describes how the company intends to pay different types of cancer sufferers in the bankruptcy settlement. Why talc free baby powder. J&J has claimed that its products containing talc are safe and will not cause cancer. It is attempting for an additional time to conclude more than 38,000 cases in bankruptcy and stop new cases from coming forward in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million to an additional trust to settle lawsuits filed in state courts by attorneys general claiming that J&J violated laws against unfair business practices in the State of New York as well as consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers about the dangers of its talc products.

Several states had begun consumer protection measures against J&J prior to LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from progressing in 2021. Why talc free baby powder. New Mexico and Mississippi had already initiated lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson before then, and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative requests or subpoenas in LTL’s court papers.

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy along with cancer sufferers and The U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They have argued that a profitable business like J&J can’t benefit from bankruptcy protections meant for struggling debtors.
The first time LTL attempted to settle the lawsuits in bankruptcy was dismissed following similar arguments. The U.S. appellate court ruled the LTL did not have “financial financial distress” and thus not eligible for bankruptcy protection. Why talc free baby powder. LTL filed a second bankruptcy within two hours of that dismissal, arguing that the second bankruptcy was different due to the fact that it was able to borrow less and more backing for a settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s new bankruptcy violates the state’s law enforcement authority in attempting to unilaterally limit the company’s liability for state consumer protection measures.

Why Talc Free Baby Powder

LTL’s new filings also included additional details about the way in which the company will evaluate and pay claims for cancer when the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The most significant payments under the settlement will be $500,000 for those diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to age 45 and $260,000 for people diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer before age 45.

The proposed settlement offers discounts based on the nature and severity of cancer, an individual’s age, the history of usage of talc and other variables. Why talc free baby powder. For example the case of a woman who used the talc product on a regular basis, had the family history of ovarian cancer, and was diagnosed with stage II ovarian cancer at age 55 may qualify to receive a payment of $21,125 under the program.

Judge ordains J&J and talc opponents take part in settlement talks.

After another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to use a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company as well as those who oppose the strategy to engage in settlement talks, Bloomberg reports.

The second time it attempted to file for bankruptcy for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to handle the claims company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Why talc free baby powder. While a group of law firms representing plaintiffs supports the proposal, another group opposes the move.

The previous week, the opposition group, known as the Official Committee of Talc Claimants and urging the bankruptcy court for dismissal of the matter by argument that LTL cannot be regarded as financially distressed.

“The filing is a desperate and legally ineffective attempt by a few of law firms to block claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan that the vast majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Why talc free baby powder. “The law firms who filed the filing are pursuing financial interests which do not align with, contradict and contravene those which their clientele. We’ll soon submit an appeal before the court of appeals.”

Why talc free baby powder. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which is home to more than mesothelioma victims who have filed lawsuits against J&J and J&J, has said that the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J is likely to fail.

“J&J issue press releases describing how fantastic its plan is, while requesting that details of the plan, such as what individuals with illnesses would receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in the statement. “What is J&J’s plan to hide?”

Kaplan has instructed both sides to devise a second strategy for reorganization, under the oversight and supervision of mediators.

As of February 2022 Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve J&J from the tens of thousands of claims related to its talcum-based products.

However, in January of this year, an appeals court in the United States overturned the ruling, ruling that the company was not able to be considered to be in “financial difficulty.”

After J&J’s challenge the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed in April, J&J declared bankruptcy just two hours later. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 calendar days to decide whether or not to approve another bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine goes out of control after $6.9B talc litigation charge.

With Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has purchased 19 months of which cases have been on hold. Why talc free baby powder. J&J wants the claimants to decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J requires 75% support for the settlement to be approved.

In addition to the gang of talc lawyers who panned the company’s bankruptcy play, the U.S. Trustee which is a division from the U.S. Department of Justice has also filed motions to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.

In a recent filing, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the the bankruptcy court remain “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” These doors “are not open to any parties who do not have a legitimate bankruptcy reason or want to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors.” Vara continued.

For its part, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their products containing talc, such as its iconic baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market–first to be available in North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

J&J is determined to stay clear of the costly business of going to trial. It has won the majority of the cases that have been resolved through trial, though some losses have been harsh.
A well-known trial in Missouri resulted in a $4.7 billion judgment against the drug manufacturer but was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are appealing or settled. Out of 41 trials 32 of them ended in winning for J&J either through a mistrial or plaintiff verdicts that were annulled in appeal. Why talc free baby powder. Separately, the company has announced plans to settle over 1000 cases for the sum of $100 million. Bloomberg announced at that time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Why Talc Free Baby Powder

Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits across all 50 states. The talcum powder lawsuits for Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Why talc free baby powder. The lawsuits assert that long-term use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including baby Powder along with Shower to Shower which can cause ovarian cancer among some women.

This page offers the J&J talc power litigation update and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will affect the final settlement amounts of the cases of ovarian cancer.

Has the deadline passed for you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many people who think the statute of limitations has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or get a free and quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Why Talc Free Baby Powder

June 2 2023 Update: During the asbestos talc case at the trial in California yesterday, technical issues disrupted the opening speech of defense attorneys. Why talc free baby powder. Jurors who were watching from their homes via Zoom and hearing the Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express doubts about the 70s research affirming the presence of asbestos in their product, but the opening was abruptly ended.

The plaintiff could introduce their first witness, Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals in talc is inevitable. He claimed that his group advised J&J in 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos the talc manufactured by the company, though with just 0.1 percent. He also found more asbestos in 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update: Why talc free baby powder. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J decided to spin off its Talc segment and file for bankruptcy marks an important moment of the ongoing lawsuit drama. Trial started on Monday in the heartbreaking case of a young, 24-year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma last year. which lawyers on both sides of the argument agree is a grave tragedy.

Opening statements laid bare distinct differences between each side’s narrative. The attorney representing the plaintiff took aim towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive techniques in its research practices and throughout the litigation process. According to the attorney the company tried to manipulate asbestos’ definition, in spite of internal documents from 1998 and 1994 that show fibers discovered in the tissue of the plaintiff are included.

Johnson &J’s highly uncertain $8.9 billion settlement is hanging in the balance with the progression of this trial. Despite the particularity of this mesothelioma case and its unique challenges compared to other talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could cause the company with a major setback in its hope of gaining broad acceptance for their proposed settlement among plaintiffs.

May 31 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupted talc unit has was able to defend its Second Chapter 11 filing in the in the face of challenges from talc injury claimants. In an objection submitted to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the filing differed fundamentally from the earlier filing. It highlighted the extraordinary commitment to $8.9 billion to J&J which is the largest settlement ever made in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. Why talc free baby powder. It was not mentioned how the amount of the settlement signifies that it’s a fair settlement. J&J also claimed support from several plaintiffs’ legal firms that represent over the 60,000 plaintiffs. This is difficult to verify but likely incorrect.

May 24, 2023 Update: Since Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the first trial on its cosmetic talc items allegedly with asbestos content is scheduled to commence jury selection on Monday, May 24, California with Alameda County Superior Court, an historically reliable place for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure from J&J’s products which that the company does not deny. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the second J&J Talc bankruptcy are currently disputing who should be chosen to fill the position of the future claims representative, an important role critical to resolving claims involving talc. Why talc free baby powder. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the country was appointed as the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense attorneys want Ellis to be appointed to that role in the future, however lawyers representing the talc plaintiffs are objecting to the claim that Ellis has an interest conflict that would prevent her from taking on that role again. The conflict stems from the fact that Ellis was reportedly involved in the creation of the hotly litigated second bankruptcy, which raises doubts about her capability to remain neutral. However, the reality is that this bankruptcy could get dismissed anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company that J&J formed for the talc litigation bankruptcy disclosed to a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they had allocated $400 million to pay the allegations made by states who accuse the company of deceptive advertising for its talc-based products. Why talc free baby powder. It’s a $8.5 billion settlement for cancer patients. It’s hard to imagine an eventuality where J&J could push the settlements of baby powder through given these numbers. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer might seem like a huge sum at first, it does not look very appealing when you consider the math. The proposed settlement based on our rough calculations would not provide victims with much more than an average settlement $100,000 per instance. That is not enough.

May 15th, 2023, Update J&J might be facing lawsuit by an advocacy group that represents cancer patients. Why talc free baby powder. The group contends that J&J deliberately withdrew an $61.5 billion funding agreement that it had with its company subsidiary LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group argues that this act amounts to a fraudulent transfer of the victims’ compensation rights. They will investigate J&J’s actions after the announcement of the dismissal of the LTL’s bankruptcy case in its first instance.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a petition to dismiss the second bankruptcy petition filed by J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. In the meantime this bankruptcy court has issued an Order that requires both parties to take part in a settlement mediation in the hope that the global settlement can be come to fruition.

May 5, 2023: Update on Talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging its talc products caused cancer through asbestos exposure. Why talc free baby powder. Over 2,700 people have sued the company, and it was spending $1 million a month to defend itself. The company’s recent $29million settlement at the Supreme Court of South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing for equitable distribution of assets between talc claimants rather than being taken through the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of legal proceedings.

May 4 2023, Update U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch talks with lawyers who have rejected the company’s $8.9 billion deal. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties gathered in court to discuss next steps in the second bankruptcy case. Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.

This is the best way to resolve these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement can be made. Why talc free baby powder. However, it’ll require additional money – perhaps billions of dollars – coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided over whether to accept the proposal and not all clients see the situation the same way their lawyer does. This second case of bankruptcy is bound to be a failure the judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to decide whether to close the case for the third time.

May 3 2023 Update A group of cancer patients suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked that J&J’s Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block the litigation surrounding talc-based products. The group representing claimants for talc has filed a motion this week asking that the Third Circuit to consider their case and then send it back the lower court, with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Why talc free baby powder. They also asked that stoppage of tort litigation against J&J continue to proceed.
LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was rejected in the Third Circuit earlier this year with an $8.9 billion agreement. The committee believes that the recent ruling allowing LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, as well as halting the trials against J&J should be subject to an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee has also requested be the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J intends to file a reply to the appeals court saying that the filing is a “desperate and legally flawed effort” by a few of law firms with different financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: A question people keep asking is how plaintiffs and their lawyers turn on $8.9 billion. Of course, that is quite a sum. There are a lot of victims. Why talc free baby powder. And these are really good arguments for plaintiffs. We were reminded recently by two talc-related trials that have resulted in huge verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon led to a verdict that was $18.1 million. In the same month, a different talc mesothelioma case went to the court within South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29 million to the plaintiff. The defendant in both cases was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc., one of the top manufacturers of talc in U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: J&J first attempted to drag the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it came with an offer to reserve $2 billion to settle the case. The sum was ridiculously low. None of the talc plaintiffs believed in it. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they have the support of a substantial segment of the talc plaintiffs and their attorneys. Why talc free baby powder. But 75% of the plaintiffs in the talc category, which is needed for approval of the bankruptcy plan is not an easy task since there are so many lawyers with huge inventories of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed to the settlement.

What is the solution to this impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023, Update Talc patients have sought a court order to reject the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially troubled. LTL requested Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. Why talc free baby powder. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that LTL was not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief because it had not demonstrated financial distress.

The plaintiffs argue that the Second Chapter 11 case is an misuse of the bankruptcy system and that the case is being handled in bad faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement has “significant support” from companies representing approximately 60,000 plaintiffs. It’s safe to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims are divided over what they believe is an $8.9 billion settlement offer.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has ruled that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that it offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. Even though trials for Talc lawsuits are suspended for at least 60 days however, new lawsuits may be filed, and lawyers will begin preparing their cases. Why talc free baby powder. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its plan with the second bankruptcy case.

April 13th 2023 Update: most important update is about the $8.9 billion over 25 year period settlement offered. Lawyers representing cancer victims involved in MDL class action MDL group action pledged to fight the settlement alongside talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s not enough money for those suffering from cancer who are 70,000. Why talc free baby powder. These lawyers believe that J&J could negotiate a greater settlement or pursue individual claims if the most recent bankruptcy is thrown out.

However, there is a second lawyer group that isn’t part of the leadership of this class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated tens of thousands of cases. The group is seeking to settle today with what they believe is less than the victims deserve. Their argument is two-fold. First, they argue that the settlement – about 100 million dollars on average per plaintiff is fair.

This is an argument that is difficult to make. But their second argument has more force: the victims can be no longer patient and demand their money now.

April 12 2023 Update: Some people are wondering if J&J is able to file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complex and convoluted. However, let’s attempt to explain it in simple terms.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only method to settle both present and future lawsuits involving talc conclusively. Also, it thinks it will pay less in the event of a bankruptcy element that creates pressure to negotiate a settlement. Why talc free baby powder. Driving past the 400-year span of American time, the business claims that bankruptcy benefits all parties as it distributes settlements more fairly and efficiently than trial courts, in which some litigants receive substantial payouts, while others are left with nothing.

The main thrust in the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – an enterprise that is profitable, forming a subsidiary to take the legal burden and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress contemplated when drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled that the subsidiary was not financially difficulty due to the fact that J&J offered unlimited financing.
Thus, J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the funding unlimited part of the contract and did not promise to offer unlimited funding for litigation. The company claims that revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary will address appeals court’s concerns while still offering funds to pay claims. As if providing victims with lower amounts of money would resolve the overall issue.

Lawyers representing cancer victims who do not agree with the agreement counter this argument by saying that it is the legal argument. Why talc free baby powder. They counter with legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s decision. The hyperbole wasn’t spared by the victims’ lawyers, who call it the most significant “fraudulent move ever in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. However, it’s a means of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement to keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 Update: Bloomberg is running an intriguing report on a brand new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the suit for class actions. The funders who fund litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits in the case of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged for a share of any wins. J&J has now offered that it will pay $8.9 billion to settle all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is public information due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about outside funding backers. The law is designed to address the growing calls for regulation of litigation funders. J&J has to deal with more than 60,000 lawsuits when you combine federal and state infant powder litigation. Third-party funding in mass tort claims has its pros and cons. But there is no question that we are seeing how third-party financing can help level the playing field between people as well as large corporations in the courtroom.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s enjoyable to see the worm turn in this lawsuit. J&J was hit again this week when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to continue the automatic stay as J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision before the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay halted thousands of talcum cases and stopped any new lawsuits from being filed ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc liability off into a bankrupt company over a year earlier. Why talc free baby powder. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was invalid a few months ago, the stay was revoked. J&J wanted to see it continued pending hearing the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The likelihood that for the Supreme Court is willing even to take up the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay now fully lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the talcum powder class action MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc-related lawsuits were added to the MDL in the last month which brings the total number of pending cases up to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update The following information is available: A Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that authorities from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) begin an investigation into the amount J&J Talc products have cost the government over the many years.
in a letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of ignoring the dangers of its talc-based products for many years, while tax dollars were used to treat those who were injured through exposure to the product. The demand comes just weeks after J&J’s major loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Why talc free baby powder. J&J must begin making reasonable settlements to victims, in order to put all of this behind it. It’s a mark on one of the most prestigious businesses.

February 14 2023 Update: In a hearing today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.